• chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    51 minutes ago

    Using an LLM to parse stuff is like using a rocket launcher to kill an ant.

    You can accomplish the same thing using a million times fewer resources with a purpose-built program.

    • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      Well, if your KPI is how much you use an LLM like in some reports - this is an easy way to get those good indicators. Also, LLMs are super easy to use to parse things, whereas many special programs like IDK grep isn’t exactly user friendly. Not to mention not finding patterns really. Though here I’m thinking things like looking at various logs on computers.

  • jobbies@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 hour ago

    These stupid companies are getting everything they deserve and I’m loving it.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 minutes ago

    Gonna bump my gaming rig to 64GB as soon as these asshats get what we’ve all known was always coming to them

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 minutes ago

    This is 100% the thesis I’ve been shopping personally… Many Boomers and Xers in executive positions had a “magical millennial” that they quietly kept as a secret “AI” to split/edit PDFs, set up an Airtable base, add columns to a google doc, etc. There was a tacit, silent agreement in this symbiotic relationship for the bulk of the last 20 years - you’ll make sure I don’t look completely incompetent in tech matters and I’ll backchannel on your behalf to senior leaders and people who “matter” to help you advance.

    Gen AI essentially allows the laziest input, gives a half competent output that “feels” fine and has the bonus of telling the boomer/Xer that they are actually amazingly capable, and could have done this themselves all along even, but they rightly delegated the task to their magical millennial, and now to the AI of choice.

    So they fired all the magical millennials, because they knew too much about the before times. Now that they are fucked without a life raft, costs soar and they will cling for dear life because they will be exposed otherwise.

    Edit: through a twist of fate, the iPad kids grew up technically incapable and relied on the magical millenials as well. They could only offer praise and loyalty really, or a boomer, Xer recruited them in and talked the MM up as a “wiz” to seek out. Anyway, now that the MM are gone, the Zoomers and gen Alpha kids only have one strength remaining, the old people have no idea what they are doing or how to quantify their success, outside of “use more AI”. So the fragile balance remains for now, with a vulnerable, hollow center where the magical millennials used to live.

  • jcorvera@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You know, if we were taught to use something like LaTeX, this wouldn’t be an issue because of BEAMER

    • yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That wouldn’t fix the issue though. The problem seems to be that most people only put out a PDF file when sharing slides, and never end up sharing the source file (the .pptx or .tex file).

      • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        This is likely because PDF became the “file that everyone can open”, just in their web browser. It’s the next best thing to a web page for non-techie consumption. Yes, there’s no reason people can’t open pptx in most cases, but I bet various endpoint protection and just not understanding how to even pick the right program to open the file steps in.

  • Bakkoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I showed multiple morons how to doctor up their safety photos using copilot in hours that it cost the company i contract for insane money. I dunno if it she’s but I’m doing my part?

  • PortNull@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 hours ago

    And Accenture itself reportedly started requiring senior staff to start using AI or risk losing out on promotions.

    Every time companies urge employees to use AI and then regret the cost. The fuck is wrong with people? Why are they pushing it so hard? Does Sam give them hand jobs if they use the most?

    I don’t understand this need to pressure staff into using something and threatening punishment if not. Are they worried that their employees are not efficient enough? Pay them the token prices on top of their salary and see how stuff changes.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This is actually very common across businesses. My company actually has our bonuses tied to AI adoption, so we have dashboards showing people’s AI usage. Other major companies have done the same, which lead to the practice of “token maxxing” where people were using AI to make more AI calls to boost their numbers up.

    • 🌸𝓯𝓵𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻🌸@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The fuck is wrong with people?

      That’s the corporate hive mind, all afraid of missing out of a great productivity tool. And they think that because media these days just copies what the richest people say and hype it up because the rich these days only speak to yes-men.

      and then regret the cost

      Reality doesn’t need to obey yes-men.

    • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      True except the 80% of people who will suffer further because of it, and the 20% that will gleefully be laughing to the bank and buy up everything at a discounted price. Few of us should be cheering for the failure or success of AI.

  • EndOfLine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Consulting giant Accenture is trying to figure out how to stop non-technical workers from blowing through companies’ AI token budget on trivial tasks like converting PDFs to presentation slides

    Sounds the people they hired to do the shit work don’t actually want to do that type of work. I, for one, am shocked. Shocked I tell you!

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The problem seems to be that it takes competent employees to get anything useful out of an LLM in the first place. However, it is these very employees whom the greedy CEOs want to replace. So the result is that an incredible amount of money is being spent on absolutely nothing.

    The logical conclusion, then, should be that it would make more sense to replace these useless CEOs with AI. Since they’re just making idiotic decisions for a lot of money anyway, there could be lots of savings.

    Unfortunately, however, that will never happen, because contrary to all that talk of KPIs and such, what really matters in the upper echelons of management is never efficiency, but rather ruthlessness and brown-nosing.

      • DandomRude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Indeed!

        “The bubble doesn’t want cheap useful things,” Doctorow said. “It wants expensive ‘disruptive’ things: big foundational models that lose billions of dollars every year. When the AI investment mania halts, most of the models are going to disappear, because it just won’t be economical to keep the data centers running. The collapse of the AI bubble is going to be ugly. Seven AI companies currently account for more than a third of the stock market, and they endlessly pass around the same $100 billion IOU. AI is the asbestos in the walls of our technological society, stuffed with wild abandon by a finance sector and tech monopolists run amok. We will be excavating it for a generation or more.”

        I think that pretty much sums it up.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    AI is about to join the list of “stupid technologies that people should really wait and see before investing on”, which includes

    • 3D TVs - complete dud
    • Blockchain - useless for real world problems already solved by typical computing
    • Metaverse - still one of the best jokes around
    • Folding screen phones - overpriced junk
    • Fully autonomous self driving cars - “Just around the corner” for the past 10 years
    • Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Folding Phones Sales Continue To Increase since 2019, showing people seem to like them

      • glarf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Two time buyer, can confirm. They’re legitimately useful and durable enough for me.

        • morto@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Two time buyer as in you liked it so much and bought another, or two time buyer as in the first is already inoperative and got another?

          • cass80@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            36 minutes ago

            Not the same guy. But I’ve been using foldables since 2019 as my primary phone. Samsung fold 1 -> 3 -> 5. No case, no protectors, keys with phone in same pocket. Never had an issue.

          • glarf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            My fold4 lasted 3 years, and still works. I’ll concede it was only able to unfold to about 85% open at the end when I decided to upgrade. I was happy to upgrade to the fold 7 which has a redesigned hinge and better dust protection. I acknowledged the risk of mechanical failure as a possibility compared to a slab phone and after using it for years I decided I was still very impressed with the flexibility of having a tablet in my pocket. The fact that my 7th generation is significantly thinner and has a 200MP camera compared to the 4th is what sealed the deal.

            It’s not perfect for everyone, but I wouldn’t go back to using a slab, there’s too much functionality I’d be pissed giving up.

            Granted, I tend to upgrade my phone every 2 years or so anyway.

        • Jiral@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I don’t think they are for me but I honestly would not include them in that list above. First of all, there is no investment bubble around them and secondly some people seem to like them and are ready to pay for them. They also do have legitimate benefits (but also downsides)

          • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yeah I didn’t dislike the 3d monitors/tvs they just had too many caveats at the time and VR kind of ate its lunch.

            • Jiral@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 hours ago

              3D stuff has the fundamental issue that VR and 3D views are just incredibly straining on the human user. Folding phones have no such issue and their durability is also good enough to be competitive (yet clearly worse than regular smart phones). They are really not comparable to 3D monitors and VR.

              • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                34 minutes ago

                I think the strain is really dependent on the person as it never really bothered me, it definitely is a problem for some people though. Either way I don’t think it belongs in the same category as blockchain bullshit

                • Jiral@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  29 minutes ago

                  It is straining for everyone but yes, some can handle the strain better than others. It just takes so much more mental energy to handle. Most can’t handle it well though, which is why those technologies never manage to break out of their niche.

                  I do agree however that it is quite different from NFT and other scams. It is a really fascinating technology with real use cases but just some foundational issues that prevent it from leaving their niche.

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This could also be explained by the entire rest of the market being different flavors of the exact same thing. A little over a decade ago, we actually had choices in what type of phone we wanted. Now, if you want anything other than an identical slab, foldables are your only choice.

      • yucandu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Disco Stu says disco record sales have trended upwards for the entire decade of 1970’s. If this trend continues… eyyyyyyyyy!

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Some of these turned out to be useless, some just haven’t been adequately delivered yet.

      In 2040 folding phones and autonomous cars might be great, but blockchain will still be a solution in search of a problem.

      • FirmDistribution@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Hyper Loop was an insane idea (in a bad way).

        Motherfucker wanted to invent subway, but for cars, making cities even more dependent of cars.

        • flyingSock@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 hours ago

          hyperloop was very low air pressure subway tubes for high speed trains. Works for research tesring tracks impractical to infeasible for real world applications. But it apparently what killed high speed rail in california (because wait this will be better)

          The cars in tubes thing was a seperate stupid idea.

        • officermike@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I don’t know that he really wanted to fully execute on Hyperloop so much as build hype (and Tesla stock price) around the idea while sabotaging funding for California’s high speed rail project. But yes, end goal to keep people buying his cars.

      • encelado748@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Cold fusion is a scam, not a bad idea. There is no scientific basis for that. Is as bad as “infinite energy engine”.

          • encelado748@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Green hydrogen is water electrolysis with solar power, not scam, it works, it is just a question of making it economically viable. Hyperloop is just stupid, but within the realm of possible. Cold fusion is the only scam here.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Metaverse - still one of the best jokes around

      This one I slightly disagree with. I got my headset on a black friday and it was super cheap, but VR documentaries are friggin’ amazing and I hope museums will invest heavily in it in the coming years.

      Fully autonomous self driving cars - “Just around the corner” for the past 10 years

      Definitely. Makes me feel good for people who make their living driving trucks.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The metaverse isn’t VR in general, it was meant to be a virtual space in VR where users could be advertised to and buy/rent things and space like in a physical city.

        It failed because those were the intended starting points, and it didn’t solve any problem other than a shitty attempt at a “I want to live in a ready player one world” and didn’t have any compelling reasons to actually use it, let alone use it and pay ridiculous amounts to do interesting things there. They always just wanted to be the middlemen, offering space for others to pay for and do something interesting in. The most interesting thing they came up with is having a meeting with avatars instead of faces on a screen (and most people don’t even want to turn on their video and just do a voice conversation instead).

  • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    converting pdfs to presentation

    I don’t get this, We’ve had OCR for a while. All around San Francisco Ive been seeing ads for “llamaparse” with the tagline “we parse pdfs”, like is that all you do? How do you afford this marketing budget?

    • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      PDFs are so shitty to work with, it’s like translating them, it’s impossible without using a tool like Google translate.

      I fucking hate PDFs as much as I hate Adobe.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I HATE PDFS TOO. I hate them! 99.999% of the time I’m given a PDF file it would be more useful as an HTML file.