• daq@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    43 minutes ago

    Do any alternatives allow using banking apps or android pay or android auto?

    I realize there are no substitutes for banking apps, but are there any alternatives for android auto or pay if those cannot be installed? Preferably Linux alternatives.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Did some research and here are your options:

    • use custom mod (the new restriction only applies to certified devices). You can use microG (/e/, iode, Lineage) or sandboxing (GrapheneOS) to run apps requiring Google services. Google will still try to kill it but my bet is it will still work for at least a couple of years
    • Ubuntu Touch - you can buy new devices with it, it can run android apps using waydroid but you will not be able to run any apps requiring google services. It can run native Linux apps. Native UT apps are build using QML. It has a completely new system API so it’s closer to Android then native Linux. It’s based on Halium which uses the kernel from Android
    • PostmarketOS - native Linux running native Linux apps. Can use waydroid. Few supported devices but everything works on PinePhone Pro and few others phones.
    • Droidian or similiar - Debian running on Halium. Kind of half way between PostmarketOS and Ubunut Touch. Native Linux but running on Android based kernel

    Personally, I will stick with GrapheneOS for now (my Pixel still has at least 6 years of support). When I’m unable to run all the apps I need on it I will switch to two phones setup: stock Android for work/car apps, some Linux phone for everything else. When my Pixel dies I will switch to iPhone.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Google has already started killing GrapheneOS by removing device trees from AOSP releases. Android 16 works fine, but for how long?

      I would imagine the first thing any custom ROM would do is bypass Google’s app restrictions.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if in 3 years I would need to pass hardware attestation to install a calculator app from the Play store.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      You will be able sideload but the developer has to be authorized by Google. I.e. you can still install apps from f-droid but people publishing apps on f-droid will have to register with Google.

  • woland@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Great. This could be just the boost that free android needs. Graphene and eos can brace for a few new customers i guess

    • RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Graphene developers seem enthusiastic to all the bullshit that Google comes up with, and on security/privacy tradeoff they seem to usually choose security. Case in point, the mandatory battery update.

      CalyxOS seems to choose privacy first, but that project folded recently.

  • tomenzgg@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m probably going to spam this around a bit, since most people don’t seem to know about it, but a reminder that FuriLabs has a (GNU+)Linux phone with decent spec.s and the ability to run Android app.s (from what I’ve heard) pretty decently: https://furilabs.com/

    Biggest drawback is it’s based on Halium. Usual growing pains of a new product/company apply but apparently the company is pretty responsive and their dev.s have worked with customers to get things like calling working with the carrier and bands of their country where it hasn’t worked before so improvements move pretty quickly.

    Collection of different experiences I’ve variously seen online over the last year or so:

    I don’t own one, myself, so I can’t give any personal experience but I’ve seen it around for a few years now but most people don’t seem to even know about it. Maybe there’s a reason for that? But none I’ve ever seen anyone say.

    • GorGor@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 hours ago

      HOLY SHIT IS THAT A HEADPHONE JACK?!

      Seriously this ticks boxes Ive given up on. I never thought Id see a phone with all three: waterproof, removable battery, headphone jack. It even has wireless charging which isnt really one of my boxes but is a little extra if you use it.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    215
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Google getting rid of all the things that made people want an android phone over an iPhone.

    • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Linux phones are moving fast but it feels like Android is moving faster on the other direction 😥

      (Yes I know Android is built over Linux, I mean more traditional and open distros like postmarketos)

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Whatever things made people get into Android some 20 years ago are no longer relevant to the majority of people.

      The biggest benefit will remain the apps. People love apps. In that regard, their only competition is Apple. It’s why no one can make a new phone OS.

      The other reason is cost. If you want a cheap device, Apple has no such thing. There are hundreds of Android devices you can buy for a couple hundred dollars.

      For those who buy Samsung flagships for more than an iPhone, well those people I can’t explain.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        46 minutes ago

        I can see apps becoming less important over time. PWAs were basically what Apple originally planed for the smartphone anyway and now they are capable of damn near anything you would want an app to do. No store to rely on. No updates to install. No storage space being eaten into. The browser engine functions as a layer of abstraction between the scary untrusted app and your own OS. It’s kinda perfect.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I mean, there is still UI/UX, app store policies, and general cost/options.

        This definitely makes Android a lot less appealing. But it is also questionable to act like the biggest reason to use android was sideloading apps since the vast majority of users don’t even know that is an option (and probably shouldn’t since they have no understanding of how to vet them). Especially since Apple isn’t any better (?).

        • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          54 minutes ago

          Ui/ux is honestly worse on android compared to something like ios. The playstore is honestly stuffed with ads and seems to be actively regressing in ux (the update apps menu is hidden behind like 3 layers of dialogues). Cost wise a used iPhone is probably a better deal than a cheap new android phone.

          I used android primarily because I could install apps Apple basically doesn’t care about (and after the 5th time gba4ios broke).

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            So… “the ignorance of the masses” should be combatted by willful ignorance and nonsense that falls apart the moment anyone looks at it?

            Get angry. I sure am. Look for alternatives. Graphene sure ain’t it but I hope it will be in the next four or five years. But this is something google are willing to futz with for a reason: The vast majority of users don’t care about it and even with the changes it isn’t significantly worse than the competition.

            Yet everywhere I see “Well, I guess I have to buy Apple now” which is just… buy it if you want to but don’t pretend this shit is why.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s still a step up from iOS, which has had similar restrictions since they started.

          • suigenerix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            somewhat

            Yes. Only in the EU and only since 2024 when Apple was forced to do it by new laws. It’s reasonable to assume Google would be subject to the same laws.

            If you live outside if the EU, it’s “no sideload for you!” There are computer programs that can do sideloading to iPhones, but they have limitations, like having to refresh the sideloaded apps every seven days.

    • Fedditor385@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Unfortunately, that is 0.1% of their global market that is affected. So, they don’t really have much to lose.

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Oof, time to bite the bullet and switch email providers. Shit like this is why I’ve spent the last couple years de-googling my life.

    • themadcodger@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Do it! It’s not that bad. Everyone’s got different needs, but I switched to fastmail and have been enjoying it.

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 hours ago

        If you’re making the switch anyway, get yourself a domain name from a separate company to run it through. That way in the future you can keep using your domain even if you switch mail/web-hosting providers.

        • a1studmuffin@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Two minor concerns about this approach:

          1. Will the lesser known domain name make your emails more likely to be filtered as spam? I don’t know the answer, but I am fairly sure it wouldn’t help.

          2. Will having your email routed through a middleman open up security issues? Probably solveable with diligence and awareness, but I recently had a non-technical friend with this setup get his Gmail breached because he was forwarding it to an email inbox on his personal domain from decades earlier that he forgot about, and didn’t have 2FA on the domain webmail. IMHO an easy oversight for anyone, honestly.

        • themadcodger@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I have a domain and an email address through it, but my problem is I can’t find a domain name I like enough to both keep and give out to others as a long term contact point. The one I have right now is silly, and not easy to communicate over the phone.

          It’s a me problem, but if I ever figure out something I’m will to keep and is available, that’s the goal.

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Have two:
            The silly one for personal or non-professional stuff like Steam
            The professional one for the ones you are meeting irl.

            • themadcodger@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Yeah, that’s the part I’m having trouble with. Can’t decide on something serious, easy to communicate and that I like. Definitely a me problem.

  • xodoh74984@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    147
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Remember that brief period in the US where, for a fleeting moment, Lina Khan went after a few companies for monopolistic practices?

    • generator@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Right, only install “verified” from Google Play, but that is where malware is, other 3rd party app stores like F-Droid, that really verify apps are at risk of getting killed by Google

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        71
        ·
        11 hours ago

        This is very obviously step one in a plan to kill apps like alternative YouTube clients that block ads, just like the Manifest V3 rollout was intended to kill ad blockers in Chrome. Once they have everyone using this verification system, then they can just arbitrarily deverify anything that contravenes whatever new acceptable usage policy they just made up.

    • ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Google can’t keep malware off the platform now, but sure, make it mandatory you can’t go anywhere else unless they say so first.

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    11 hours ago

    How about letting the users decide what to sideload? What the hell?

    I hope the EU is ready to also sue Google.

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The EU already forced sideloading to be officially supported on iPhones thanks to the Digital Markets Act, and that law applies to Google as well.

      The US will likely apply pressure, just like they are trying to force their death machines to be legalized on European roads. Apple already tried to pressure the union and failed, but the political climate has changed a bit since then, and while EU bureaucrats can be fierce, European leadership tends to be weak as fuck.

      But yeah, chances are that this change won’t apply to the EU. :)

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s too bad they were too terrible at writing legislation to be successful.

        • cabbage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          What exactly do you mean?

          Sure, nothing is perfect, but EU legislation has generally been quite good, from the GDPR to the DMA.

          The challenges are more related to enforcement - rules on the book are worth nothing if we don’t force companies to live by them. In this respect we’ve seen some pretty sloppy behaviour, but also some victories. It’s not a one-sided story.

          Another challenge is of course to keep passing good laws, and to avoid terrible ones. Chat control needs to be stopped. Stopping it is a matter of convincing national governments it’s a bad idea, as well as members of the European Parliament - everyone should be writing their representatives NOW. But that’s another issue entirely. :)

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            don’t iphones delete your sideloaded apps against your will and along with your data, if you don’t use the ibstaller tool at once every week?

            if so that’s useless for anybody other than developers themselves who otherwise don’t even want to use their own app.

            • cabbage@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I have no idea as I don’t follow apple much, but I am aware that they are constantly trying to find ways to avoid complying with EU law, and that it is often rapidly struck down.

              What you’re describing here is not a failure of the law, but Apple trying real hard to find creative ways not to comply with it. To me it only shows that they are desperate, and that EU law is in fact getting to them.

              If they keep at it it’ll eventually end up in court, the case will take a couple of years, and they’ll be slammed with a fine and asked to get their shit together.

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        European leadership tends to be weak as fuck.

        which is utterly disheartening.

        • cabbage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Google is clearly trying to find a loophole here. Their loophole clearly sucks.

          In all likelihood it’ll end up in front of the Court of Justice of the European Union. And in all likelihood Google will lose again.

          The Court of Justice generally seems unimpressed by American lobbyists, so the strategy of finding a dumb loophole is probably doomed to fail.

            • cabbage@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Does the law demand unsigned software?

              The answer is no. It’s not phrased like that. But it’s all about ensuring free competition in digital markets. The sole purpose of Google’s move here is to hinder competition in their own digital market, and to keep control over it.

              So the law does not have a paragraph stating that “unsigned software must be allowed”, but it has a bunch of other paragraphs that can be used to strike down on monopolistic behaviour.

              Google are aware of the law, and will try to find a loophole by designing a system that they believe technically complies with it. Then someone will sue them, it will end up in the European court, and the European court will in all likelyhood tell Google to get fucked.

              It seems american tech companies think they can get away with anything because that’s how it works in the US. We are repeatedly seeing that this is not how it works in Europe: the Court of Justice tends to care deeply about the intention of the law, as well as the perceived consequences of their rulings. And they don’t seem to care all that much about American capitalists.

              But to answer your question very simply: No, it doesn’t. But thankfully that doesn’t matter at all.

              • paraphrand@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                I feel like there should independent signing authorities that the major platforms honor. But that’s its own can of worms. Who runs them, is it the government? A non-profit? How do we prevent corruption of that entity, etc.

                And yeah, the tech companies have raced ahead of comprehension. At least the comprehension that reasonable and good lawmakers have. At the same time, it’s increasingly looking like the terrible people in power know just how far ahead tech is. (Thiel)

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The EU is currently deepthroating Trump so hard that it’s completely out of breath and all our clothes are ruined.

      With how volatile Trump is this could change literally anyday, but with the current political equilibrium all google would have to do is gift trump a shiny golden thing so he makes a threatening remark about gas exports and the EU would go “uwu yes master right away master, do you want to fuck my gaping asshole while you’re at it?”.

    • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      There’s already a firm divide between the foss/self sufficiency crowd and modern tech.

      If this is bad enough, you’d see every foss faithful walking around with a laptop, mp3 player and camera like they’re in 2009.

    • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It was always intended to be this way.

      The beginning was pre-enshittification. We’re going from the good ole’ days to the future, and the future sure as shit aint for you unless you’re in the club… and you aint, none of us are.