Pennomi

How is what I said AI apologism? I clearly expressed concern that the technology isn’t reliable or cheap.

Yes, it will take a substantial change in LLM architecture to make them viable for general use. Like you said, a couple orders of magnitude improvement in training would be the biggest help. Though I’m not sure that’s even possible.

Or it will become foundational tech like the Internet. People said that was a fad too.

It all depends on whether or not it becomes reliable and cheap.

They all died in a freak longboat accident. The Vikings responsible were never apprehended.

It’s not just democracy, but information quality in general.

This is what we get for seeking profits more than truth.

Except ConcernedApe, apparently.

I’ve bought it at least 5 times; sent it to a lot of family members.

It seems clear that during training they weight Musk’s tweets (and those of accounts he likes) more heavily than everyone else’s.

I used to use Amarok probably 20 years ago, glad to see it’s still kicking.

Agreed, drug development is a very good use of AI.

That’s because Musk directed his people to weight his tweets and the tweets of people he agrees with more than everyone else.

Dude is so fragile that he had to create his own echo chamber to feel like anybody loves him.

It’s easy to tune a chat to confidently speak any bullshit take. But overriding what an AI has learned with alignment steps like this has been shown to measurably weaken its capabilities.

So here we have a guy who’s so butthurt by reality that he decided to make his own product stupider just to reinforce his echo chamber. (I think we all saw this coming.)

Popular photo and video editing apps like Photoshop, DaVinci Resolve, and Avid Media Composer already support it, alongside Chrome, Safari, and Firefox. Apple’s iOS and macOS also work with the new file standard.

This is all the article mentions. I hope you’re right about the backwards compatibility.

Not necessarily, but everyone having access to cheap labor AND raw materials would ensure that.

Now I’m not going to pretend that AI is anywhere close to being a source of cheap labor. It really can’t do much without a human to assist it.

I’m not entirely sure of that. While corporate AI would certainly cause that, right now there are open weights models which can be run on a relatively affordable computer, and they are not that far behind. These models are able to democratize AI benefits rather than concentrate it.

The movie had themes about AI revolution, while the book was around robopsychology. Since this anecdote was about an AI gaslighting itself, it’s far more appropriate than the movie thematically.

Claude eventually resolved its existential crisis by convincing itself the whole episode had been an elaborate April Fool’s joke, which it wasn’t. The AI essentially gaslit itself back to functionality, which is either impressive or deeply concerning, depending on your perspective.

Now THAT’S some I, Robot shit. And I’m not talking about the Will Smith movie, I’m talking about the original book.

Part cost is estimated to be under $5000 and take a week for a novice roboticist to build. Very cool, but me and my kids will probably skip this one.

They used to be a non-profit. Doubly fucking hypocrites.

OpenAI’s core message was “we can’t release our GPT model because people will try to use it for war”.

Fucking hypocrites.