I’m about to start my 12 week paternity leave next week thanks to a state program and almost everyone that I’ve told has had their jaws on the floor that I would even want to do that.

Today I witnessed a group of coworkers almost bragging how little time they took after their kids were born. I’ve heard stuff like “Most men are hard working and want to support their families so they don’t take leave”.

To me it was a no brainer, I’m getting ~85% of my normal pay and I get to take care of my wife, our son and our newborn for 3 whole months. and for someone who hasn’t taken a day breathe in the past 3 years I think I deserve it.

I’m in the US so I know it’s a “strange” concept, but people have seemed genuinely upset, people it doesn’t affect at all. Again, it’s a state program available to almost anyone who’s worked in the past 2 years, I’ve talked to soon to be dads who scoffed at the idea and were happy to use a week of pto and that’s it.

I feel like I’m missing something.

  • stardust@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    Sounds like attitude of wage slaves that have been brainwashed into doing everything for the corpos and being fine with getting scrap. They live to work as opposed to work to live.

    Can’t change the slave mentality of some people. They were just born to be one.

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    18 days ago

    Americans are weird.

    Honestly the time with your partner and kid is precious irreplaceable.

    Anyone who’s weird about it is insecure about their own paternal involvement.

  • Applesauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    17 days ago

    I went through the same thing when I took my paternity leave. Other male coworkers bragged about how they went back to work the day after their kid was born.

    It’s a culture thing where our society is conditioned to be boot lickers for the ruling class. I responded to them at the time, “Congratulations on being a bad father, I’m going to take every day entitled to me”

    Don’t fall into their trap.

    • DrFistington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      17 days ago

      Yup. Had old union buddies I was talking to after my first, and I brought up that he had a diaper blowout earlier, and they were like “I’ve never changed a diaper in my life!”

      Just told them " damn, I’d be too embarrassed to admit I were that bad of a father in public…"

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      17 days ago

      I find it hilarious when people brag about things they think are cool but it just makes them look like dumbasses.

      “Lol I can drink 24 beers in one sitting”

      “I never call in sick, I can be hacking up a lung and I’m still there at the office”

      On and on…

      • shawn1122@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        These are the idiots that put the ruling class in the position that they hold today. Is it any wonder why they have so much power?

    • shawn1122@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      There’s nothing impressive about a man going back to work the day after their child was born unless they somehow popped the newborn out of their precious little asshole.

      All it means is that they’re willing to put their wife at risk of post partum depression and that they don’t give a shit about their child. Not a thing to be proud of there.

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    17 days ago

    You are surrounded with workaholic, misogynists. My company gives full pay for 12 weeks for mothers and fathers. Several of my coworkers, mostly men, have used their leave in full (usually 9 weeks together and the other 3 broken up). Nobody ever looks down on people for taking leave.

    Maybe they would take all of it if it was for full pay. Ya’ll motherfuckers need a union.

  • viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    16 days ago

    People are idiots. Why would you give up a benefit you’re legally entitled to? Nobody is going to as much as thank you for that.

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      In the US fathers don’t have any legal right to take time off from work. It’s expected that you would miss at most a few days for the hospital visit.

      • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Fathers don’t have a lot of legal rights there, don’t they (“There” as in USA)

      • Reyali@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 days ago

        FMLA does cover leave for fathers, and in 2020 the DOL said 56% of US workers were covered by FMLA. That’s still a lot of people who don’t have those protections, but it’s still demonstrably incorrect to say there isn’t “any legal right [for fathers] to take time off from work.”

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      Furlough was such a sweet deal during the covid lockdowns. Like 80% pay and no work? Sign me up!

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    17 days ago

    What you’re missing is full brainwashing from the patriarchy, from the bootlicking capitalists.

    Any partner who can but doesn’t support their partner and newborn is an ass.

    Any partner who can but doesn’t take advantage of the leave benefit they earned is giving free money to their employer overlords like an absolute cuck.

    Be revolutionary, put your family over your employer.

    • shawn1122@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Be revolutionary, put your family over your employer.

      If that’s revolutionary, we may be beyond saving.

    • foxglove@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 days ago

      Yea F those tools that judge you on wanting to be there for your wife and kid.

      For some providing a reliable income is their way of supporting, but man is it great to actually provide the time to be there in person

  • daddy32@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    17 days ago

    Do it. Be with your offspring as much as you can. Anything else is barbaric corporate slave mentality.

    In our country, both parents are allowed to spend 6 months (each) at home with the newborn.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Paternity leave is a no brainer for families of all stripes. Both spouses should have time off to care for their children in the first year of their life, especially during the vulnerable first year before they are immunized against dangerous diseases. And I’m in a same sex relationship, so I’m definitely using it when we are ready to have kids, haha.

    Honestly, each parent should have 6 mo of paid leave.

    Edit: adding onto this, all men’s bathrooms should have changing stations. It’s insane that some women’s do, but men’s do not.

    • paequ2@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      18 days ago

      Honestly, each parent should have 6 mo of paid leave.

      Heck yes. 12 weeks is nothing. The baby still needs a ton of help at this stage.

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 days ago

      all men’s bathrooms should have changing stations

      This is unfortunately one of those things that people care about greatly for a very short time when it affects them and then never more. It never really gets any traction.

      Thankfully it never was much of an issue to me, even if I almost singlehandedly changed every single diaper due to my wife having a bad shoulder. I quickly learned to change a diaper everywhere. On the floor, in the car, busting into the ladies nursery rooms, just everywhere. I got so good at it, that I bet I could change a diaper faster and cleaner than a Formula One wheel even without a table.

      Nobody ever complained. The only odd situation was when I busted into a nursing room full of muslim women where a young mother was breastfeeding. Her entourage gave me quite the looks and standing in my way shielding her, so I said “I need to change diaper”. The mother looked up and everyone was watching her for a reaction, but she smiled and said “It’s right over there” pointing me to the changing table. It was quite the stinker, so I apologized on my way out.

      However. I admit. This is not the best way to change diaper. A good diaper change is not fast. It’s a time for bonding. It’s not something I want to do in a public space with the rest of the family waiting for us, but at home, it’s the perfect time to get some eye contact with the baby and confirming that, yes, your father is there for you to get you out of all the shit you get yourself into. It’s perfectly fine if it takes half an hour in which most of the time is spent playing peak-a-boo. It’s a chore, but it’s also a much needed break from other chores. And this counts for both parents at the same time. Your partner would love nothing more than for you to disappear with the baby for half an hour.

      And that is why paternity leave is really important for the father and baby.

      • Nefara@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 days ago

        However. I admit. This is not the best way to change diaper. A good diaper change is not fast. It’s a time for bonding. It’s not something I want to do in a public space with the rest of the family waiting for us, but at home, it’s the perfect time to get some eye contact with the baby and confirming that, yes, your father is there for you to get you out of all the shit you get yourself into. It’s perfectly fine if it takes half an hour in which most of the time is spent playing peak-a-boo. It’s a chore, but it’s also a much needed break from other chores. And this counts for both parents at the same time. Your partner would love nothing more than for you to disappear with the baby for half an hour.

        I love this perspective. I’ve definitely become inured to diaper changes and I try to get them done as fast as possible, but this is sweet and you’re right, it’s a moment for some low key play, eye contact and for them to know you’re taking good care of them. What a nice way of looking at cleaning up poop 😆

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    16 days ago

    So basically, the choice is to spend 12 weeks with those idiots or with your baby? Seems like a no brainer to me.

  • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    That group you overheard were reinforcing their excuses for ignoring the needs of their child along with the needs of the mom, and reinforcing beliefs that have overwhelming evidence of being false.

    Kids needs dads in their lives, the earlier the better. Moms need dads to help out and support them.

    You’re not taking time off work to laze about, you’re switching from one job to take on several related jobs for a while so that you,your child, and your woman have a brighter future than any amount of money could buy.

    You’re only missing out on taking the easy, shortsighted route. You’re missing out on ignoring the future cost your family has to pay in the long run so that you to get to go back to the familiar routine of work. You’re missing out on staying with the known game of work to avoid taking on something new.

    You’re not missing out, they are.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    17 days ago

    The traditional view that the father needs to work is strong. In Denmark we have had the opportunity to share the maternity/paternity leave between parents for several years, but most often the mother would take the majority, with only 2 weeks being specific for the father.

    This is due to the imbalance in pay, since the cut in pay would be larger for a man (generally), so men voluntarily gave the leave to their wives. This is obviously not the intention of the leave and also based on the flaw of unequal pay. Keep in mind that the wage difference is often explained as being caused by the mother taking more leave and thereby not advancing her career during the years when they have small children.

    So, to fix his, the latest law make more weeks untransferable. The father now has 11 weeks that can not be transferred. Use it or lose it.

    One would expect such a removal of flexibility to make people upset, because technically it will cost the families more potential income, but it hasn’t.

    It turns out that most men actually wanted the additional weeks of paternity leave. They just needed it to be normalized and/or the legal framework to demand it, so they don’t have to have this discussion with their employers or wives. No man is ever asked why they’re taking it now. Use it or lose it makes sense to everyone.

    In addition we still have 26 (13+13) weeks that can be transferred however the parents want. Still very flexible.

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Shared still incentivizes women to be taking it regardless of income. Breast feeding is a lot of goddamn work and is far far far superior for newborns with no antibodies. But newborns no matter how you slice it are a ton of goddamn work. Particularly true in the early postpartum weeks when pumping just isn’t going to get consistent results.

  • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    17 days ago

    The “work yourself to death” is a stupid boomer concept. It’s a hugely negative aspect of traditional masculinity.

    When people say weird stuff like this, I always question why. Why would you have a kid and then work so hard to be away from it? Why would you work for a company that will lay you off the moment it earns them a higher stock price to do so? (no modern company deserves your loyalty.) Why would you brag about suffering instead of relaxing?

    I understand that we’re all wired differently but those values literally don’t make sense to me.

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 days ago

      The “work yourself to death” is a stupid boomer concept. It’s a hugely negative aspect of traditional masculinity.

      At least for boomers, loyalty was often rewarded with promotions, bonuses, and generous pensions. But these days companies will work you to death and then fire you for a 0.0001% boost to their quarterly profits. They’ll fire 10,000 people just so the billionaire shareholders can earn 1% more.

      • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Yup. Loyalty is a two way street. I know pretty successful companies whose former employees still speak highly of, precisely because the company did the whole “you work hard and we treat you well” thing. The moment that that trust is lost, your employees will treat you in kind. Except for some idiots falling for the propaganda of course.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 days ago

      It’s a “Greatest Generation” concept. Those depression-era folks unionized to be able to live a better life, then never bothered to actually retire and live that life. They worked themselves into the grave.

      Boomers don’t work themselves into the grave. Boomers “Retire in place”.

      • shawn1122@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        For those that are unaware, retiring in place is actually a great way to describe American politicians.

        Boomers keep their job till they go to the grave but they stop working at 65, coasting while collecting a paycheck and having others pick up their slack.