

Nurses quit. Go to the reddit nursing sub and see how often they talk about quitting over dangers to their license. They get anxiety about nonsensical stuff regarding that because it’s beaten to us in nursing school. This, nobody’s going to accept.


Nurses quit. Go to the reddit nursing sub and see how often they talk about quitting over dangers to their license. They get anxiety about nonsensical stuff regarding that because it’s beaten to us in nursing school. This, nobody’s going to accept.


This is one trying to take my job as a nurse. All I can say is, it ain’t gonna work. You’re never going to get an AI to ensure med compliance in bipolar and schizophrenia or get it to properly do affect and mood assessments for psych nursing. Might be useful for less high acuity cases that don’t require a nurse, but in those sort of outpatient cases the whole point is you don’t need this level of monitoring. I applaud the effort in reducing group home need for this population as well, but I also think that would be ineffective.


Don’t mistake my lack of sympathy with the authors diagnosis with my actual diagnosis. Dude literally complains about government picking winners and losers as the main reason you should be terrified in conclusion. That’s a remarkably naive thing for an auto industry editor to write with a straight face, to the point that it breaks credulity. You should hate the entire system, not just Trump, is my conclusion.


not transparent and seems arbitrary
Opaque regulatory inertia favoring established players could be the story of the American auto industry for the last century.


So the thesis of this piece is the government picking winners and losers in the auto industry through opaque mechanisms should terrify you because you should believe in total free market capitalism.
There’s plenty I don’t agree with regarding this administration’s trade or industrial policy. This reasoning though, ain’t it. It ain’t even new with this administration. I’m not getting the vapors over corrupt auto industry protectionism. And I’m certainly not concerned about whatever lib shit this guy is wound up about.


Cue settlement because Meta cannot stomach discovery on this one. As the article shows, this lawsuit comes from discovery in a different lawsuit. These are the sorts of dominos that trigger settlements.


we are not building a central face database
I honestly cannot understand why the parent company of Facebook would actually release such a parody sounding response


A Berkshire Hathaway company. Thanks Warren.


All of the clay gets compressed which means the water can’t drain into the ground anymore and the underground drainage canals get damaged. And then the city turns back into a fucking lake after it goes between drought and flooding because the only way to create a surface water reservoir is to turn the now sunken city back into a goddamn toxic and polluted lake/marsh. That or attempt to geoengineer it into a desert which also defeats the purpose of human habitation. Eventually “fixing” the problems will become more expensive than what they’re worth for more development but nobody really knows where that inflection point lies for the valley of Mexico.


At least the AP offers the perspective that this is likely just state terrorism even if it’s understated.


I was really interested in who the pervert experts were, but it turns out it was just human rights groups.


Because the US cannot both declare freedom of navigation as the most important part of the straight while also blockading non-US allies which they’ve explicitly threatened to do. If you approach it from a realpolitik angle like you are right now, then it justifies Iran’s actions in closing the straight from that very perspective. The US will not get to have it both ways. Either Iran was justified in closing the straight in response to US aggression or the US is violating international law and general principles of trade.


Jesus Christ. I certainly didn’t have this on my rapidly flailing bingo card of the US punching itself in the face.


In the end it’s hard to argue for the so called liberal democracy that was often extremely corrupt compared to Thomas Sankara style populism there.


the precedent is set that it costs 3million per person
Far from it actually. If anything appeals may pare down damages and nonpunitive damages must be backed by actual calculations. The bigger point I think is this sort of case can survive.


You guys aren’t quite as turnkey as, say, Japan. They’ve got reprocessing and rocket production from JAXA and really would have to just put together an implosion device.


I wish LNG was that simple. Most of qatar LNG production comes from dedicated natural gas fields(the North field) but they also have quite a bit co-extracted with oil. That requires big facilities to compress it. Without them they’ll just flare it like they did in the past and dump the CO2 right into the atmosphere with no gain.
Less unions in this case and more since nursing is governed by Boards that come from the profession it’s very hard to have regulatory capture from outside the profession. There’s places with strong unions and they’re great but that’s far from universal. And no BON is going to accept this shit as standard of care which means you really might lose your license once some “monitored” manic person goes off their meds with nobody paying attention and drives in circles in a city naked without drinking water all while you’re charting that they’re monitored. And no nurse wants to lose the ability to practice for some shit ass employer.