Israeli officials suggested that the increased military aid was part of a deal to get Netanyahu to agree to the Gaza ceasefire deal. Trump’s envoy for the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, has said he’s pushing for the full implementation of the agreement, but the ceasefire is very fragile as Netanyahu doesn’t want to implement the second phase.

  • officermike@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Ah yes, giving Netanyahu even more bombs is totally the right way to bring about a ceasefire and definitely won’t just lead to more Palestinians getting blown up.

    • wurzelgummidge@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The only difference between Harris and Trump is that the latter can’t keep his gaping orange maw shut. Well maybe she would have put in a few more military bases instead of casinos.

      • Geobloke@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Just wait until you heat what Trump just said. That graph but for trumps real estate empire in "Israel "

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          As ever, BlueMAGA liberals care more about what crimes Trump hasn’t committed than the ones Democrats have.

          • Geobloke@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Don’t even get a day in what happened as I’m not American. The whole US electoral system is broken and needs rebuilding

                • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  I’ll admit, you neoliberals have definitely done a better job changing the world than us. You’ve changed it to be much worse, of course, but you have changed it.

    • Lunar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      she did nothing but indicate her intentions to do the exact same thing, just as biden before her

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        12 hours ago

        You still haven’t learned the lesson. The war in Gaza is happening regardless of who is president. It was irrelevant to the decision of who to vote for. It was always just a distraction to voters.

        • Lunar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The war in Gaza is happening regardless of who is president

          how is it therefore the fault of people who didn’t vote then?

    • pedz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      If enough people voted, the Democrats would have given people free health care, stopped financing wars, torture and genocide, improve public transit, boost public education, and lowered the cost of groceries. If only enough people voted for the Democrats, they could be in power and bring change. They just need a super majority to install a welfare state and turn into pacifists. Of course!

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I get your sarcasm, but let’s be clear - Dems have had a supermajority 3 times in the past 25 years, and we got none of this shit. They’re full of crap when it comes to fulfilling campaign promises. Wish we could say the same for republicans.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The Democrats had a filibuster proof trifecta for 73 days in 2009 and they passed Obamacare. Republicans spent the next decade trying to destroy it. I’m not saying Dems would do all of what you said, but when they are given the chance they move things in the right direction.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I think they pretty clearly wanted the Democratic party to stop arming Israel, which did not happen, and probably wouldn’t have happened if they were elected, either, given they made no promises on it and gave no real indications of course correction.

      This is like if the guy on watch duty on the Titanic spent a year screaming about how they’re heading directly for an iceberg, the captain did nothing, and then got mad at the guy on watch when the iceberg sank the ship.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It’s almost like nothing would change no matter who won and Israel was just a political pawn to help Trump win.

        • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Wow, I can’t believe people weren’t more motivated to vote for “nothing will change no matter who wins.” Truly nobody could have foreseen and warned of this.

            • Lunar@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 hours ago

              except your initial post was blaming people who didn’t vote for harris for what’s happening in gaza. stop moving the goalpost.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Maybe. But there’s a big difference between what Trump might do in the future and what the Democrats have already actually done for real.

          • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            12 hours ago

            That what Trump will do will be worse is a certainty for anyone who paid attention the last time he was in office.

            • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              12 hours ago

              All these BlueMAGA liberals who couldn’t even predict that they were going to lose the election now suddenly acting like they have Dune style prescient super powers.

    • GlacialTurtle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Fuck off you disgusting piece of shit. Imagine being such a dumb fucking cunt you attempt to scold random voters for the Democrats decision to support genocide and claim it’s their fault somehow.

      Hey, dipshit, who kept signing off on arms shipments the past fucking year? Hey dipshit, who declared a redline in Rafah only for nothing to happen? Who gave a deadline of 30 days for aid to increase, nothing improved, then they just meekly announced they weren’t doing shit as punishment?

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Personal attacks aside, yes it is the fault of voters for Trump getting into office. That’s how elections work.

        Democrats wouldn’t stop the war. Republicans wouldn’t stop the war. It was irrelevant to the choice of who to elect.

        • GlacialTurtle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          How elections work is that political parties work to earn votes of the base they want to represent.

          It’s wild how moronic dipshits like you who talk down to others about “hOw ElEctIOnS WoRk” never hold political parties responsible for the choices they made about how they campaign and why, and the policies they follow, and instead blame random nobodies asked to tick a box every 4 fucking years.

          Hey, dipshit, who forced Democrats to literally commit themselves to genocide? This isn’t a minor quibble over tax policy, like 5 vs 10% tax rate, this lis* literal genocide*, mass murder of an ethnic people directly supported by Biden and the Democrats. They were told for a year by their own base this was not going to win them votes, and they ignored it. Your response is to literally claim we just needed to factor in literal fucking genocide as a given. You are a monstrously disgusting piece of shit. The perfect embodiment of the racist liberal. Brown people do not matter to you for anything except as a performative cudgel to vote shame people over the Democratic parties policy and campaign choices, something no one else made them do. Rather than hold them responsible, your dumb fucking ass is still online doing the same tired bullshit of insisting it’s everyone elses fault except the people who have actual fucking power and actual decision making capacity to change shit.

          Here’s how democracy works dumbass. A political party puts forward a set of policies about issues x, y and z. Voters express their preferences and concerns about them and other issues. A party then has 2 options: change policy and campaigning in response to those concerns, or articulate why their policies would be better.

          So you tell me, Mr Elections Understander, what happens when voters express for over a year they don’t like a central policy that has dominated the news, but the party tells them to fuck off repeatedly? Is that a good strategy for an election to win votes, to tell people concerned about literal genocide to shut up because “I’m speaking”? Is it a good strategy to tell voters they need to just accept genocide will happen, that they need to factor it in like it’s 2% fucking inflation?

          But sure, you hitch your wagon to the Democrats didn’t have to do anything differently. It’s everyone elses fault they committed themselves to genocide. It’s everyone elses fault that something that literally every competent campaign manager would have told you, that ignoring and overriding your own base on issues they care about, whilst spending the entire campaign trying to appeal to people who hate you with “but we can be racist and do genocide too!!!” could be a losing strategy.

    • distantsounds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      There was no distinction between the candidates on this issue. Biden just sent $8 billion in arms less than a month ago. There were plenty differences between candidates, but this is not one.

        • distantsounds@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          It was a hill Biden & the democrats didn’t need to die on. The last year in Gaza was inexcusable and gaslighting potential voters was embarrassing. Shame on the democrats for making genocide a wedge issue

            • distantsounds@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Look I voted dem, my state is still blue & I can for once in my life say I’m proud of my governor. Biden was complicit in genocide and it was one of many major factors that cost the election. Remember Biden could have simply enforced the Leahy Act and stop providing mutinous at any point. Everyone could see the war crimes and bs like temp piers. He could have kept his promise and only run one term, allow for an engaging democratic primary and a graceful exit. BUT here we are

            • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              BlueMAGA once again demonstrating that they don’t think foreigners are human.

              • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                12 hours ago

                I’m sure the foreigners Trump puts into the concentration camps he is building will thank you for thinking of them.

                • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  As ever, the future crimes you’re imagining Trump committing matter more to you than the crimes democracts already committed.

                  Spare me, you’ve already said that genocide doesn’t matter compared to what colour of fascist is running the USA, don’t pretend you care about foreigners being put in camps beyond being a vector to crow about orange man bad.

        • stink@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Manipulate? Trump is so 40000 IQ that he forced Biden to look like a fucking puppet on the world stage, giving in to every single one of netanyahu’s demands.

          Trump WAS the harm reduction candidate, he got a ceasefire brokered before he was fucking president. All while Biden was licking israel’s asshole begging for scraps.

    • Michael@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Just curious, if Kamala did the same arms transfer shortly after getting elected; how would you respond or what would you do?

      Would you assure others that she is working tirelessly on a ceasefire despite her vow to always give them the ability to defend themselves?

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        16 hours ago

        As I have said before Israel was irrelevant to the election as neither candidate was going to act differently. It was only used as a weapon by conservatives to strip votes from Harris.

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          If genocide isn’t negotiable for your party, maybe you should find a new one.

            • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              12 hours ago

              In that case, if genocide is a non-negotiable certainty of American policy, then the lesser evil choice is whichever party will collapse the USA fastest.

        • liyunxiao@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          16 hours ago

          You mean it was a lay up for Harris she refused to capitalize on because she personally received too much money in bribes.

          • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            Or maybe she didn’t have a simple black and white opinion on a very nuanced situation and recognized that pulling support for Israel would only lose the US it’s seat at the negotiating table.

        • GlacialTurtle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          16 hours ago

          The people who told Democrats for months to change position were Democrats and people who worked in the democratic party, some of whom did so for decades.

          https://www.npr.org/2024/08/24/nx-s1-5086924/the-dnc-didnt-let-a-palestinian-american-speak-the-uncommitted-movement-took-note

          June Rose, the sole “uncommitted” delegate from Rhode Island, also said it was incorrect to assume the delegation members come from the fringes of the Democratic Party.

          “We are Democratic professionals. I’m the chief of staff of the Providence City Council. I’ve made my career helping to elect Democrats and defeat Republicans who pose incredible risk to the future of our country,” the 29-year-old told Al Jazeera.

          “But my relationship with the party will never supersede my relationship with my values, and in this case, my values and my party are in direct conflict.”

          Rose named Eileen Abu Odeh, a toddler killed with her family in an Israeli air raid in Gaza, during the roll call. They explained the delegation’s presence at the Democratic National Convention can serve as a gut check for the party, as it prepares to chart a course forward on foreign policy.

          “Our party cannot just make this week a celebration, and I think that that’s the tone that many in our party want to take,” Rose said. “But that celebration would be on the graves of innocent children who’ve been slaughtered.”

          https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/8/17/uncommitted-delegates-bring-gaza-war-message-to-democratic-convention

          • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Well now you can tell Republicans to change their position. I’m sure they will listen rather than shoot you with rubber bullets.

        • Michael@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          I’m asking out of genuine curiosity, what are they doing besides shaming others? What’s done is done - we are here now.

          If they had constructive or productive intentions it could apply to the current moment even with Trump in office.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      What I want is to replace First-past-the-post voting with STAR voting.

      Imagine all the time you’d save from not having to go to every single thread to blame people literally unrepresented in government for the democrats failures.

      Videos on Electoral Reform

      First Past The Post voting (What most states use now)

      Videos on alternative electoral systems we can try out.

      STAR voting

      Alternative vote

      Ranked Choice voting

      Range Voting

      Single Transferable Vote

      Mixed Member Proportional representation

    • FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Have you considered the possibility that this is not what people who voted against KKKlansmala wanted, but trump did it anyway?

      • takeda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        He was very open where he stands, and even was complaining that Israel did not wipe Palestine faster.

        • FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Trump isnt open on anything. He says something then the opposite and then agree with both statements. This isnt an exception. He said some of the most inhumane shit about the palestinians i ever heard, and he also criticized Netanyahu harder than any potus ever did. If you say he is clear about this issue, please teach us because the rest of the world cant say the same. And to add some context, 1b is a very rookie number, to say at least. Biden did 8b a few days ago in a single move. Idk if hes testing the waters with the american public and will subsequently give more or if he is giving a farewell kiss to israel and wont send a penny from now on, but theres 0 chance any potus could go without paying tribute to aipac, even if meager

  • Frank_weens@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I thought musk controls the purse. Why is he even pretending to involve Congress at this point?