

You are approaching this from the perspective of a rational peaceful person from the west,
Least chauvinistic .worlder.
You are approaching this from the perspective of a rational peaceful person from the west,
Least chauvinistic .worlder.
They are already separated. China has no effective control on taiwan . They ceased the territory to japan.
When was the legal referendum?
Lol, ok. So Taiwan can only separate with a legal referendum held by China?
You can think that, but you’d be wrong.
Interesting. So the Donbas has a right to leave Ukraine?
Before any region was part of any country it was not part of that country, by definition
Lazy adhominem
.worlders really need to expand their dialogue options, you see all of them very quickly
That was my first thought too…
So is the public owning going to lead to you developing any introspection?
Do you ever get tired of being confidently incorrect?
“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
― Jean-Paul Sartre
???
?
???
Ok. Seemed odd that you’d leave a comment with no relation to mine in response.
Where?
Did you reply to the wrong comment?
Why wouldn’t they?
It’s hard not to interpret this comment in a western chauvinistic light.
Really? When was the legal referendum?