

Right? It was self-evidently a grift, yet “serious” bourgeois rags like FT pretend otherwise.
All text lovingly hand-crafted with 100% organic em dashes.
| Pronouns | he/him |
| Datetime Format | RFC 3339 |


Right? It was self-evidently a grift, yet “serious” bourgeois rags like FT pretend otherwise.


You’re also assuming I’m not being persecuted.
Big if true.



It’s not pettiness. These are brave defenders of the liberal international order.



FYI, lately it’s a different user (or account, anyway) who downvotes your non-negative articles about China.


The languages that are vulnerable are vulnerable https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endangered_language


fail-safe motherfucker do you speak it


I wonder how James Rehwald and Lady Izdihar manage to survive on TikTok then.
Doubling down on feigned obtuseness, I see.
You can take the girl out of Reddit, but can’t take the Reddit out of the girl.
The same numerically. You’re not that obtuse, so is this a joke or are you a cringey debatelord?
social justice warriors
Okay boomer.


Not sure—I haven’t read any fascist manifestos. Maybe Blackshirts and Reds.
Dugin isn’t “Putin’s Brain” any more than Navalny was, but he is popular with some US & European fascists.


There are already dozens of decent feed aggregators, and I’m not interested in Lemmy tacking on functionality that’s superfluous to social media. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_feed_aggregators
Or do you mean follow or block posted links to sites? That functionality already partially exists at the admin level. We can block posts of URLs to specific domains. https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4514
There’s already a ticket for per-user URL blocklists: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4689


I haven’t read the article, but be warned that 972 is an Israeli liberal Zionist rag.
“Anyone who disagrees with me is a paid Russian shill.”


I believe we need dedicated spaces for political discussion that are not based on algorithms optimized for engagement (aka outrage).
So do we, which is one of the reasons why Lemmy was created, and why Lemmy does not have algorithms for rage engagement. Lemmy is all cost and no revenue, so there is no financial incentive for it to “maximize ‘engagement.’”
The first is a way to limit bots or bad actors from participating in discussions.
Where are the actually-existing the “bot problems” on Lemmy? While it could happen, I don’t think it actually is happening to any significant extent presently.


Yeah, this is community rule 2. I’ll leave this up, but please refrain in the future, @ExtremeDullard@piefed.social.


obvious bluff is obvious
guido gotchu fam https://docs.python.org/3/library/functools.html#functools.cache