• insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 minutes ago

    Relative to a normal life, nobody knows me now… and with where and how I live that likely won’t change.

    So definitely not, aside from the unlikely event I could get my head preserved (likely questionable testing). Then again I know in all likelihood that wouldn’t work, so I’m not sure getting a mention in some niche Wikipedia article would be the same as being remembered.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Me personally? Absolutely not and that’s great. Someone who is alive now? Probably yes. We know about Socrates and Caesar and Leif Erickson and Ghengis Khan and Cleopatra.

  • thatradomguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    There’s a running phrase that gets’ mentioned a lot in the Peanuts comic strip: “500 years from now, who’ll know the difference?”

    Just wanted to mention that. Peace ✌️

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I imagine some archivists might find the lost fragments of this server is some ruins and by some miracle, maybe extract this very thread.

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    12 hours ago

    “It’s my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of him was one kind of sommbitch or another.”

    No one needs to remember me except my kids. Maybe my grandkids.

  • snooggums@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The vast, vast majority of people are forgotten within 100 years. Pretty much need to be in an extremely high position where records are kept, like presidents, or do something extraordinarily positive or negative.

    I strongly doubt anyone reading this post will be remembered after the people they met or interacted with directly have died.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I actually have a geneology book (族谱) from my paternal lineage (everybody does this in China). Its just a bunch of names, and some history of the village summarized. I hate tradition and I’m already in the US right now, I dont give a shit about the stupid geneology book anymore, my ancesters will probably be so pisses to find out that I totally ignored all the hard efforts lol. (My village still has a copy, but I’m not adding more name to the stupid thing, a waste of time, its also misogynistic AF, if there’s a daugher, then the lineage doesn’t record their decendents. So dumb, as I guy, I hate this patriarchal bullshit)

      • crank0271@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Some aspects of that tradition are commendable, though. It would be neat to see this updated in a less male-centric fashion.

          • Mac@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Tradition is just narcissists convincing you to do things their way because change is ✨scary✨

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      With the U.S. only being 250 years old, I can’t say anyone would remember presidents in 600 years. If the U.S. is gone there will likely be mention of 1 president that was in power when whatever came and took/changed it. During the planetary destruction revolution there was a plethora of wasteful greed. They called it an industrial revolution that ran rampant with greed and wastefulness.

      • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        History preserved the names of heads of state from countries that had a much shorter existence or impact. 600 years might seem a long time to Americans but it’s not that long for historical memory.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Sure, then everything in history would be “remembered” forever… Except no one would know or care. To me, that is not remembered.

          I would say Jesus is forgotten completely at this point even though he is written/read everywhere

      • snooggums@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        We record these kinds of things in archives as they go along. Hell, we have records of Egyptian and Roman leadership going back centuries.

    • Lena@gregtech.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That’s quite sad tbh, we’re all just tiny specks on the timeline of humans

      • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Perhaps but what is the value of human life? Being remembered of living and enjoying life? You won’t be around to care that no one remembers you, but you are here to enjoy life right now. So why be bothered by what people in 600 years are up to.

      • Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It’s your’s to make of it what you will. It doesn’t have to be sad. It’s pretty incredible any of us are here in the first place with how many conditions had to be present for life to even be on earth. And then we evolved from single cell organisms into these complex beings that we are today. It’s pretty fucking nuts and fascinating.

      • snooggums@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I am 100% in favor of being forgotten, because trying to stand out in the sea of billions of people is a ridiculous expectation.

    • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      While that’s true, we have much more extensive record keeping these days. I’ve been researching my family tree, and 100 years ago there were still a decent number of people who were mostly illiterate. Add to that documents like the census being handwritten in cursive on paper, and you get lots of errors being recorded, and the records themselves being damaged by age.

      Unless something drastic happens, a lot of our records will still exist in the centuries to come. It will mostly be our official records, but they should still be there :)

        • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 hours ago

          It’s not just names in lists though. Using my mother’s grandparents as examples, I know where they were born and grew up, I know who they lived with at multiple points in their lives, and I know a few of the places where they lived.

          I know where and when they got married, and some of the guests, and I know what children they had and when. As they were adults at the time, I know some of what my great grandfather was doing during the first World War and how he died.

          I haven’t done a deep dive into their lives yet as I’ve been working backwards, but I’ve already got a decent idea about who they were and what they were like. I know a fair bit about his parents and family too, as I checked that side first.

          The biggest issues are finding photos, and the cost and availability of records. There are not many photos due to them not being as pervasive at the time, and there are not many records because a lot of things either weren’t recorded or weren’t saved. Both of those can be solved with the technology we have now. Lots of people have their own information saved, separate to the official sources, and it’s easier to have multiple copies of everything, so they won’t get lost or destroyed as easily.

          Hopefully this means that we’ll remember more of the past going forwards :)

  • gigachad@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I am doing Genealogy as a hobby and in most of the lines I am in the 18the century, in some in the 17th century.

    What I learned during this hobby is a simple thing - the more generations you go back, the more ancestors you have - the formula is 2^n. So if you go back 10 generations, you have roughly 1,024 ancestors.

    Now imagine how many descendants these people have? I have met plenty of others nerds who are also doing genealogy, cousins by 7the grade and so on. There is always some dude doing this stuff, so I am pretty sure there will be one in the future.

    Of course I can only go back about 300-350 years, but we people today are leaving way more traces on this planet than my ancestors in the 17th century.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      39 minutes ago

      I have a geneology book dating back 20 generations. Its all in tradition chinese and kinda blurry and I kinda never learned most of the charcters besides the basics. But I skimmed it and aparantly it dates back to 1200s. A lot of mention about emperors and stuff. Unfortunately I can’t share it with y’all since that’s kinda doxxing and I posted too much political stuff on Lemmy.

      It’s only the male ancestors, patriarchy and all, ya know.

      Honestly, besides the snippets if history, I don’t know what the point of the whole name lists is. Can’t even find the aunts on there, what good is that for.

      Like… there’s not even a portrait (like a hand drawn one), just a bunch of names. What, am I gonna use that inherit some long lost magical kingdom that’s gonna appear out of nowhere? Am I the Dragonborn? No lolz. I can’t understand “tradition”

      I guess its cool for declorations, make the house look ancient and mysterious?

      The original is alresdy falling apart lol (probably not the original original, probably copied at least 5 times already, no way it survived 800 years), then all the genology books in the village kinda got consolidated into one big one containing all households. Everyone in the village has the same last name (I think). Y’all get to have sex in highschool, back in the days, people didn’t get to choose, my parents kinda just got introduced to each other and they wete pressured to marry. Its technically consensual, but if they reject, they are just gonna introduce you to someone else. Kinda reminds me of the beginning of House of Dragon (except the part about being royalty of course, we are all just ordinary people). And my parents yell at each other a lot, kinda a fragile marriage… 🤷‍♂️

      • gigachad@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 minutes ago

        That is pretty impressive!

        So let me explain what my motivation is… I am not so much interested in origin. I don’t feel any connection to the ancestors I do not know, which starts with my great grandparents. I don’t even know my grant parents, however, there is a bound through my parents, who were brought up by them. So their character, how they see their world etc. is influenced by my grand parents.

        Now, this is limited to my grand parents, we are speaking of a period of roughly 100 years. What about the ancestors before that time? My family tree is mostly made out of dates like you said, baptisms, marriages, deaths. A huge list of more or less random people that have nothing to do with me.
        However, I am using these people to tap into the historical contexts they were born in.

        My family is entirely made out of day laborers in Germany. There are a few masons, but most of them day laborers, the lowest class you can imagine. Usually, when you study history, you are looking through a certain perspective. In Germany this will most likely be counts and dukes, aristocracy, wars, territories etc. - but not so much about the poor people. My genealogical research is basically opening a new window for me, to view history from another perspective. I collected an extensive collection of literature about the weirdest little villages and stories you would never even have heard of, if you’d just follow the “traditional” way like history is taught in schools.

        I hope this explains it a bit!

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Brave of you to assume that humanity will exist in 600 years.

    Actually, we might be, but the better-off ones will be back at sticks and stones and huddling around wood fires and the like.

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I really doubt this. Humanity is really good at surviving things.

      My prediction - at a certain point, we gain the ability to port human brains to computers. The most wealthy gain this tech first, and effectively become immortal. Using their wealth (which is likely always accumulating) they are able to afford lots of redundency and good tech + energy to function at extremely high levels of performance - essentially making them immortal gods. I assume they will form alliances and rivalries, and stake out ground based on the now-general-intelligence AIs they have created.

      Most people who choose transhumanism after this will need to utilize their afterlife continuing to work in order to pay for the ongoing cost of running their servers.

      Meanwhile, humans still made of meat will have started conducting experiments on their genetics. Initially this will be about simply reducing or removing the chance of carrying a genetic disease. But soon they will start working on how to generally be better than others - improved cognitive abilities; sexier, stronger bodies; improved emotional regulation. Not long after, it will start being considered irresponsible to have children without the standard genetic modifications that the middle class can afford. Permanent class stratifications will be etched into dna. Even further along, the rich take genetic modification into fashion, creating physical markers of class stratification which will gradually make them look less human. As genetic class differences widen, there will be increasing class wars - in each one, the upper classes and those aligned with them will eliminate more and more of the lower classes. Slavery will also make a comeback, as those without genetic modifications (or with sufficiently lesser modifications) will be deemed too irresponsible to manage their own affairs and function in society. The descendents of the ultra-rich transhumanist gods, who will have the best and most fashionable genetic modifications, will be the first to achieve immortality in the flesh. But there will probably develop a sort of cultural expectation that they eventually give up their flesh and become transhumans like their anscestors.

      Therefore, I will not have children unless I earn enough to afford their genetic modifications. To do otherwise would be irresponsible.

      • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        42 minutes ago

        Is that even human tho?

        Like the scientist who invented it will say its human, but from an ontology perspective, you can’t ever be sure about that. That could just be killing you and copying your brain.

        No way in hell I’m gonna “upload” my brain. It’s suicide. Star trek teleporters are murder machines.

  • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Doesn’t even take that long. My parent passed away and left boxes of pictures from 50 to 75 years ago and no one recognizes. Why did they have these pictures and boxes of them? No notes. Nothing.