• hedge_lord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Programming. Telling a machine “build x feature” is nervewracking because I do not know what it’s doing and more importantly boring because it takes all the joy out of writing code. Even the LLM completions I do not use because I have seen what it has done to my coworkers’ brains. I will think about the problem. I will write the code. I will know what it does. It will be of me, not of some averaging machine.

    May the LLM era end in darkness and the gnashing of teeth amen.

  • Atropos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fixing a car.

    I’d much, much rather twist some carburetor screws or replace a fuse than have to try to troubleshoot some encrypted CANBUS acceleration sensor that is required for my suspension to work properly.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 days ago

    I miss physically owning software, movies, and music, not having to pay a subscription for car features like heated seats or more horsepower. I miss getting a complete game that was usually mostly glitch free on day one you got it on CD/DVD.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    Socializing.

    No social media to distract people. Nobody staring a phones. Nobody recording themselves for streaming.

    You memorized phone numbers or wrote them down. You called or got called to meet up at some place and everyone went from there.

  • Berttheduck@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Shaving with a double edged razor rather than a cartridge one. The whole process is much more meditative and rewarding when you actually focus on the moment and take the time to do it properly. Gives a better shave too.

  • NebulaNomad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Photography. Film was so advanced, having a layer for each major colour, every film stock has a different feeling. The only downside was cost, but you only took a picture when you were sure it is a good picture. Now we have tons of digital garbage because we take 100 pictures at once.

    • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The old family picture books had so much value, now I can’t remember if I ever even looked at any past photos I took with my phone, it’s all just digital waste now

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I feel the opposite. Film sucked so bad. I love pointing my phone at things and shooting a hundred shots and finding something good there or not finding anything and continueing with my day. Old photography was a pointless torture.

    • chrizzowski@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Film is crazy advanced. One of those “how did humanity figure this out?” kind of things. Smarter Every Day YouTube channel did a thorough tour of Kodak and it’s pretty fascinating all that goes into it.

      The deliberate act of shooting that the financial and time cost definitely makes better photos. You can do that with digital as well but it takes more discipline. Far easier to shoot a dozen and hope one works than to think and come up with the right one from the start.

      Both have their place I think. Any time I shoot a race, wedding, or a once in a life trip I’m so glad it’s digital! Being able to do a 10 shot burst and nail the facial expression is pretty awesome. Then slowing down and going on a local hike and setting up my 4x5 to take one shot, or a photo walk around town with an old SLR is a blast too.

      Maybe I just like photography?

  • couch1potato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    3 days ago

    It grinds my gears that programs are called ‘apps’ now. On phones it was normalized immediately, so, sure. Computers run programs, though, god dammit.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Microsoft have been calling discrete computer programs “applications” since at least the Windows 95 era, when Program Manager was replaced with the start menu. They’ve been inconsistently kinda-sorta doing so since even Windows 3.x, maybe even more, but nobody was closely paying attention back then.

      It didn’t become the current situation of monkey-see-monkey-do until Apple started using the terminology heavily with the iPhone, as you have observed. But they actually cribbed it from good old M$, much as they’ve cribbed basically everything else they’ve done in the modern era from someone else and simply painted it glossy white.

    • CannedYeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Program is such a funny word when you remember it’s an analogy from radio and TV. Radio and TV are just delivery mechanisms for programs, which are the content and point of the medium.

      You could define a podcast as an internet-delivered audio program.

      • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        In the UK, “programme” is used for events, TV shows, and schedules, while “program” is specifically used in computing contexts.

      • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        The term was changed to application when Win 95 came out. An application runs over the API (Application Programming Interface) in Windows, whereas a program in MS-DOS ran straight off the motherboard.

      • Longpork3@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Outside of Unix based programs, probably not a lot.

        In terms of their functionality most programs are standalone applications rather than tools where you modify the programming flow of the data.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    Japan mostly skipped PCs (outside of offices). Since their phones were ahead of the curve, a lot of stuff was designed for them. That means that a bunch of stuff is either exclusively done through some shitty mobile app, fax, or in person. There was a brief phase where PC versions did exist, but those are almost all being neglected or decommissioned now. I much prefer to do things on a PC with a nice, clear, big screen, especially if I need to use some translation tool since the text tends to expand (learning thousands of kanji for stuff like legal and taxes is hard).

    I do miss physically owning media. A lot of physical media still decays, though, so not a panacea.

    Software programs that were much more tested and completed before release.

    Software development where we think things through, define requirements, define states, etc. before any code is committed. I do think PoCs are fine to throw something against a wall but, if it works, the proper version should go through those design phases before anyone writes a line of code. Cheap components and fast machines and networks have made people lazy which makes software worse in a number of ways quite often. No vibecoding. No AI/LLM shoved into everything. I think they can have uses in certain contexts (rephrasing questions, generating examples/docs in projects with bad/no docs, etc.), but hate how they are being shoved into everything.

    An internet not run by corporations. I think a lot of people do see it through rose-tinted glasses (we still had trolls on BBS, UseNet, IRC, etc. and other bad actors), but a lot of things were much better.

    Third spaces. Places where people of different backgrounds would interact in some common way. Sure, some were echo chambers just like online communities today, but many were not and let people interact together rather than just being othered to the point of fear and reviling.

    I much prefer AD&D 2.5 rules to anything around today (and TSR still existing, but that ship has sailed).

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I do miss physically owning media. A lot of physical media still decays, though, so not a panacea.

      I prefer digital media that is locally stored. Many complaints I see about digital media revolves around DRM or a service’s ability to remove media that you think you “own”.

      I think locally stored media solves that without taking us back to the days of a shelf of hundreds of DVDs.

      I do own some physical media like certain very old PC games but only because there is no good digital option available that’s more convenient.

      • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I use locally stored digital media, but I still love my shelves of DVDs, CDs, and paper books. The CDs get ripped to FLAC and mostly left on the shelf thereafter, but I do still enjoy taking a movie off the shelf and loading it into the player.

  • Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I want a phone where I am able to reach the top and the bottom of the screen without shifting my grip. Also being able to comfortably store in a pocket would be nice

  • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    I liked connecting to irc servers and setting up a znc bouncer (also an on ramp into self hosting!) way better than anything matrix and discord do.

    We had mumble for voice chat and that was perfectly serviceable.

  • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    TV.

    I hate the smart-TV workflow, its a terrible user experience: Turn the TV on… wait for the smart-TV OS to load… land on an app menu… navigate around and choose an app… wait for the app to load… select a profile… wait for the list of shows to load… scroll almost endlessly through shows… choose a show, finally… wait for the video to load…

    I miss when you turned the TV on and it was just instantly playing whatever channel you last had on, with one single interaction. I miss not having to make the conscious choice of what to watch and feel overwhelmed by so many options. I miss TV programs being a common experience, like an event, that everyone would be talking about together the next day, instead of everyone watching their own thing on their own schedule.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 days ago

        Except when you couldn’t know in advance when your show skipped a week and they had to play some crappy rerun of a completely different show.

      • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        A group of us used to meet every week to watch Twin Peaks. We’d unplug the phone, drink coffee, and eat cherry pie (or apple for a bit of variation). Then we’d watch the episode again having just recorded it and try to figure out wtf was going on. Happy days.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      If you haven’t used free Over-the-air TV these days you might be surprised that most cities have a few dozen channels of live TV right now. If your in a large metro area get the simplest of cheapest TV antennas, plug it into your TV, and do a channel scan. You’ll be surprised how many channels there are now.

      If you’re in suburbs or rural, you’ll still likely have quite a few but may need a more substantial antenna.

      • Wolf314159@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 days ago

        I have cable. It doesn’t really work like that anymore. I used to be able to click through ALL the basic cable channels, catching a frame or two of every single channel, with zero delay between channels, all within like under a minute. These days every channel change or menu selection has a built-in delay of at least a second or two. Channel surfing just doesn’t vibe the same anymore. That form of TV is mostly if not entirely dead.

      • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        You’re not wrong, although I think I’d still have to wait for the smart-TV OS to load and navigate the menu to select the Cable input.