• 0 Posts
  • 667 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle

  • The Fragmentation Trap If you try to do everything yourself (the “solopreneur” route), you theoretically need a “tech stack” of 4-5 different subscriptions.

    I’m not sure you appreciate how amazing it is today that a single “solopreneur” can actually perform all those roles all by themselves with software and skills of their own. Each one of those used to be an entire profession that required years of school and tens of thousands of dollars of tools and materials.

    That said, there are good free open source tools that do most of those big things you cited. Examples include

    • photo editor - GIMP
    • Kdenlive - video editor

    Would love to hear your thoughts on navigating this expensive landscape.

    Starting any business requires money and time. You can “buy” shortcuts in time by spending money on more expensive tools. Alternatively if you have more time, you can do things more manually.




  • For rich people, it’s not about using it or making a practical purchase. Its a way to show others how much you care about them (none).

    I was thinking about this topic just a few days ago. I have another theory. Yes, yacht ownership is a method of communication, but they’re not trying to communicate with the common people, but instead indicating to each other of their level of wealth so they can find equal peers or greater peers to associate with, or greater to avoid.

    A rich person with $10M net worth has almost nothing in common with a rich person with a $1B net worth.





  • Wouldn’t it make more sense for Brazil to send up their own satellites with rockets that are already capable

    I’m assuming you mean “rockets that are already capable” from other nations? Brazil already does this.

    than to waste time, money, energy and

    Brazil isn’t wasting any money. This is a South Korean company launching a South Korean satellite from Brazil. In fact, Brazil is benefiting financially, which could, to your original point, feed more people because they have the money from these launches.

    hurt the environment by trying to launch their own?

    Funny enough, launching from places like Brazil is actually less environmentally damaging than launching from the USA, China, or Russia because this Brazilian launch site is on the equator, meaning less fuel is needed to launch from here than other nations with spaceflight programs. This geography is why Europe’s launch site is also pretty close by in French Guiana.

    So if your concern is less environment impact, you would want MORE of the worlds rockets to come from here.

    I’m not saying Brazil doesn’t need to launch a satellite, I’m saying they don’t need their own rocket program.

    As already stated, this isn’t a Brazilian rocket, nor a Brazilian rocket program.



  • I like a California roll, and I like that its all veg and grain, so I’ll choose it when thats what I’m looking for, but there are many other rolls I like more. The avocado isn’t a selling point except that its not meat or dairy and there are times I’d don’t want to eat either of those.

    Guac is still “meh” for me. Again, I’ll eat it if its there, but I don’t seek it out.





  • yeah, sure thing buddy. the CO2 will be in a closed loop until it won’t. just like Fukushima and Chernobyl were supposed to be closed loop systems, until they weren’t. disasters happen, no matter how much the techbro mindset insists that they’re impossible.

    So you concern is the ecological impact should this bubble fail and the entirety of the CO2 is released to the atmosphere as pollution? Did you even read the article? They discuss that.

    First, a full on failure would be rare. Then, a full on failure of 100% loss of the closed loop CO2 is equivalent to 15 round trip flights of a jet flying from New York to London. To put it in perspective there about 250+ flights of this length per day from London, with many being much much farther.

    So you’re comparing the impacts of a once in a lifetime nuclear power plant failure to the impacts of another source 1/16th of something that already happens every in one airport. Your logic is why out of whack on this if this is your concern with the bubble.



  • Your internet traffic is already encrypted in transit, that what the “s” in https means.

    You don’t get the “s” until you have the “https”. Your DNS request which turns www.TheWebsiteYouDoNotWantKnown.com into its IP address happens before you have the “s” in “https”. By default, that request is sent in plaintext, and frequently by default, to your internet service provider. So an outside monitor may not be able to see the contents of the website once you establish your https connection, they likely know that you went there and have a good idea how long you stayed on it.

    While its also possible to encrypt the DNS request with DoH or DoT, its not on by default and requires the user to take configuration actions in their browser. If they’re looking at VPNs for the first time, they likely don’t know this and are sending their DNS requests in the clear.