Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    364
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Just to fast-forward this dumb cat-and-mouse thing, the next step is people go back to torrenting their porn and deeper down the rabbit hole of garbage “free” websites skirting the rules.

    As always, the UK is useful on the international stage because sometimes you need to be able to point at some idiot trying dumb stuff to explain to people why dumb stuff is dumb.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      111
      ·
      5 days ago

      It does feel that way. UK bureaucracy is just one giant guinea pig stunting it’s own commonwealth.

      Next someone will try enforcing paper umbrellas as a solution for climate action. We’ll all say, “That won’t work”. They’ll still do it; it won’t work. We’ll say, “We told you so”, and it won’t get reversed because they’re already aiming at the next foot to shoot.

      • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        5 days ago

        There has to be a logical next step for the information age. Old school government is not fucking working, and we can all see it.

        The fact that there aren’t large scale riots already is astounding.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I am pretty sure they would consider tor as using a VPN.

        Probably they would demand ISPs to run lists of known VPN addresses and if you connect to them, they will forward the information to the anti-terrorism unit and you will get SWATed.

          • Tiger@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            I believe China can stop any kind of access at any time, they just choose to allow a certain percentage of folks to get through above a certain bar of sophistication and need.

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Don’t the people in those countries use a proxy to access tor first? probably that means cycling through the proxies regularly as they become known. I have no doubt that it is impossible to prevent truly tech savvy people from access. Also Russia, Iran and China all run state sanctioned hackers, so the governments have a vested interest in allowing these groups to obscure where they are coming from.

            But i am not sure how much that transpires to a broader public.

            • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              5 days ago

              That’s what things like snowflake and bridges are for. Because, at least with snowflake, it just looks like a webRTC phone call. But it’s actually tor traffic. And snowflake proxies are ephemeral, since you can just run them in your browser and help anyone connect.

    • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Their next strategy will be to keep a list of websites that are “government approved”, I’m afraid. Long live the Great UK Firewall!!