Which is a very easily recognized pattern, color, and size. The entire point of a dollar is that every single one looks identical.
Imagine if every single dollar bill was a different color, shape, size, printing pattern, etc… Now imagine trying to block that. Now consider that as soon as you figure out how to block all of the current versions, anyone in the world can just design a new version in 5 minutes.
If you mean changing which app natively gets used for texting, that’s not something you can do on iOS. You can choose to open a different app, but if I tell Siri to text someone it will always 100% without a doubt no way to circumvent it use the standard Messages app. iOS doesn’t let you change your default for texts.
Hell, they only allow you to change your default web browser because they were dragged into court kicking and screaming. And even then, all third-party browsers are forced to use Safari’s engine for the backend, and aren’t allowed to use their own engines. Even Chrome, Firefox, and Brave are just reskins of Safari on iOS. And even then, any apps that open an in-app browser will still use Safari even when your default browser is different. For instance, I’m browsing lemmy on Voyager, and it opens all links in a built in Safari browser, (even though my default browser is set to Firefox.)
I have had major issues with exFAT across a variety of platforms. But I also work with a bunch of niche gear. But my point is simply that being widely compatible isn’t the same as being fully compatible. And OP was asking for the best way to reach the widest compatibility. That calls for FAT32, even if it has issues with things like file size.
This was my immediate thought as well. Portable launchers for the various OS’es on a tiny (just large enough to store the launchers) FAT32 partition, then a large FAT32 partition (the majority of the drive) encrypted by VeraCrypt. As long as it can read FAT32 and run VeraCrypt, it’ll be compatible. And that covers Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi, and Mac ecosystems. It’s not as simple as just plugging it in and getting a password prompt, but it’s going to be the most compatible while still allowing for (nearly) the entire drive to be encrypted.
Even worse, many of those scammy companies use the Do Not Call list as a list of known active numbers. Since the DNC is an opt-in thing, the call centers know that people have proactively added their numbers to the list.
Yeah, voice notes are the “your solution to your problem is somewhere in the middle of this 20 minute long YouTube video that could have been a short forum post with some screenshots instead” of the communication world.
The Bible Game. It’s a game that was originally released on the GBC or GBA; I honestly can’t even remember which… I downloaded a ROM pack for my retropie and discovered it hidden inside. My buddy and I got drunk one evening, and decided to boot it up for shiggles.
It has you running around trying to answer bible verse questions to get keys from demons. It’s the single most boring and unintuitive game I’ve played. It also blatantly got several of the Bible verses wrong. We looked it up online, and there’s also a version that was on the Xbox, but it apparently had wildly different gameplay and was more like a game show, where the players answered trivia questions.
You’ve got a few questions here, so let me break it down…
What is a crack?
A crack is simply a way of defeating DRM. In the old days, games would often require the game disc to be inserted before they would boot. It was a very easy way of preventing people from simply sharing the files. Because even though the game was installed and didn’t need the disc, the game would simply refuse to launch without the CD in the tray. It was a sort of physical DRM, because disc burners weren’t super common yet so copying a game disc wasn’t super easy.
So the crack simply edited the part of the game that checked for a CD. Sometimes it was as simple as removing the few lines of code that told the game to check for a CD. Sometimes it was simply a matter of telling the game that the disc was always inserted. But that’s just an early example of a crack; It was modifying a game file (or files) in some way, to make them boot even when DRM would normally prevent it.
Modern cracks are much more complicated, but the end goal is the same. Crackers are simply trying to defeat the DRM, so the program will boot. It usually modifies a few files, to get the program to boot when it normally wouldn’t. The cracks are usually fairly small in size, because the actual program .exe and a few .dll files are usually all that gets changed. So patching the program is usually as easy as moving the cracked files into the respective folder, and overwriting the legitimate files.
Why does a crack show up as a virus?
Lots of modern cracks need to do some pretty fucky things to defeat modern DRM. It often requires intercepting network traffic that the launcher would use to “phone home” to a company server. For instance, maybe the launcher checks in with a company server to verify that your program is legit. If the server responds that it is, then the program boots. So the crack would potentially need to intercept that network traffic, then spoof a response from the server. But you know what else does something like that? A virus, attempting to hide itself.
And modern antivirus softwares don’t rely on “hard” virus definitions to identify viruses. The traditional way of scanning for viruses was to just keep a massive database of known threats, then compare files against that. But that’s slow and new threats constantly need to be added in order to keep your virus scans accurate. And if a hacker is able to change their virus slightly, you’ll need to add a whole new item to the database just to target the change.
So instead, they use something called heuristics, which basically means they look at how a program operates, then guess whether or not it’s actually a virus. It uses common virus behaviors and pattern recognition to try to identify a virus. This increases the chances of a false positive, but means scans are much quicker and will catch new threats in the wild even when they haven’t been officially documented yet. But since different companies use different virus definitions for their heuristics, different antivirus programs will give false positives to different cracks.
If it’s only a few flags on VirusTotal, you’re likely going to be fine. It’s most likely a false positive from those antivirus programs.
If you already have a NAS, (since SMB was mentioned, I’m assuming there’s some sort of NAS setup going) then you may even be able to host Plex directly on the NAS. It likely won’t be powerful enough for things like video transcoding, but just audio should be fine.