• LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Does anyone have a good in depth guide on how to de-google? My ultimate goal is to not use Google at all and use Graphene OS on my Pixel

    • aurelar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Thanks for making it easy, friend. It takes a lot of clicking to turn this stuff off lol.

  • earthworm@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    13 hours ago

    You have been automatically OPTED IN to allow Gmail to access all your private messages & attachments to train AI models.

    “Feature”

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That‘s the only way to truly get rid of their shenanigans. I started degoogling a while ago. I learned that a faulty spam recognition system at Youtube can ban all your accounts (they know your google alts even when you never linked them) instantly for a comment you posted in a livestream, thinking it‘s spam. That includes your mail accounts and google pay. Just like that. Imagine that, you lose access to your mails, the google app store and your preferred paying method without a warning because you posted the same laughing emote 3 chatters posted before you. It is very dangerous to be too dependent on a single platform so I moved my mail somewhere else. I pretty much only use Youtube regularly now in terms of Google products.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m not seeing where any of this gives Google permission to train AI using your data. As far as I can see it’s all about using AI to manage your data, which is a completely different thing. The word “training” appears to originate in Dave Jones’ tweet, not in any of the Google pages being quoted. Is there any confirmation that this is actually happening, and not just a social media panic?

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I would opt out just in case. I remember using Adobe Acrobat at work and noticed they read every single PDF and generate a few comments about it even when you never asked them to. Meaning they‘re scanning through potentially confidential data. I have no doubts Google will do the same sooner or later.

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The only option is smart features, on or off. That requires Google to read the email to categorize them and do a lot of basic stuff. It doesn’t let you narrowly have more privacy on specific features. It’s all or nothing, and if you get a lot of emails then it’s hard to turn it off if you already use categories. Google always does all or nothing because they know people need some of it, same with location. It has to be precise location tracking to use things, you can’t just do rough location.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yes, but the point is that granting Google permission to manage your data by AI is a very different thing from training the AI on your data. You can do all the things you describe without also having the AI train on the data, indeed it’s a hard bit of extra work to train the AI on the data as well.

        If the setting isn’t specifically saying that it’s to let them train AI on your data then I’m inclined to believe that’s not what it’s for. They’re very different processes, both technically and legally. I think there’s just some click-baiting going on here with the scary “they’re training on your data!” Accusation, it seems to be baseless.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Understand that basically ANYTHING that “uses AI” is using you for training data.

      At its simplest, it is the old fashioned A/B testing where you are used as part of a reinforcement/labeling pipeline. Sometimes it gets considerably more bullshit as your very queries and what would make you make them are used to “give you a better experience” and so forth.

      And if you read any of the EULAs (for the stuff that google opted users into…) you’ll see verbiage along those lines.

      Of course, the reality is that google is going to train off our data regardless. But that is why it is a good idea to decouple your life from google as much as possible. It takes a long ass time but… no better time than today.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Understand that basically ANYTHING that “uses AI” is using you for training data.

        No, that’s not necessarily the case. A lot of people don’t understand how AI training and AI inference work, they are two completely separate processes. Doing one does not entail doing the other, in fact a lot of research is being done right now trying to make it possible to do both because it would be really handy to be able to do them together and it can’t really be done like that yet.

        And if you read any of the EULAs

        Go ahead and do so, they will have separate sections specifically about the use of data for training. Data privacy is regulated by a lot of laws, even in the United States, and corporate users are extremely picky about that sort of stuff.

        If the checkbox you’re checking in the settings isn’t explicitly saying “this is to give permission to use your data for training” then it probably isn’t doing that. There might be a separate one somewhere, it might just be a blanket thing covered in the EULA, but “tricking” the user like that wouldn’t make any sense. It doesn’t save them any legal hassle to do it like that.

  • ApeNo1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 hours ago

    On the web UI they sneakily slide in the Gemini icon exactly where the settings icon is after about 2 seconds of loading the page which caught me out for the first account I was updating. Really annoying.

  • fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m honestly kinda surprised that Google is apparently not in fact doing this already and (according to the comments here) continues to not do so.

    • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They don’t give a shit about what the law or terms say. They’ll just do whatever and if caught pay pennies on the dollar in fines.

      We’ve seen them do this and win time and time again with the google library project and other actions. All the AI companies are training on any and all data they have access to, laws be damned. It’s the MO for any new venture capital / tech project with unlimited profits if someone gets there first.

      • aurelar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It would be par for the course if they just ignored the settings changes when it comes to training their AI on your data, and you’re just turning off your access to the AI features instead.