What does this mean?

By uncalled for I mean there’s not really a factual and warranted reason for it.

I tried to present the two sides opposed to each other. How many people feel vs how that’s usually not factually appropriate. Doesn’t magically change that we feel that way of course.

I think that’s somewhat common and natural, but also unnecessary and uncalled for.

Let the other party decide for themselves whether they’re fine helping and to what degree. From your side, take the help you can get.

Yale University’s Environmental Performance Index, which tracks 40 performance indicators—including “Sanitation & Drinking Water”—in order to pinpoint the most environmentally friendly countries in the world. Additional performance indicators tracked by the EPI include environmental health, climate change mitigation, air quality, waste management, biodiversity, fishery populations, and more.

Sounds a bit like “stuff in place doing things” rather than actual quality tests. If so a bit of greenwashing seems feasible.

Sounds more like a development index than a quality index.

When you drink hard water, are you getting stoned? 😏

3

Yeah seems like a good number for an ama

Thank you for making them just to show them in a picture here

and when you add apples into the pastry(?), then they are Mälgribbelscha

Content curation.

I upvote or leave neutral opinions and arguments I disagree with if they’re well argued or otherwise contribute to discussion and strengthen respectful discourse.

I don’t know how you feel when your posts get sum-negative scores, but it makes me feel rejected and makes me not want to participate. I receive it as a social indicator. I see it as something that leads us towards echo chambers.

I mainly use three Lemmy accounts. Sections content/themes.

I signed up for… maybe 8 Lemmy, maybe 12 Fediverse things?

Dubious and disagree downvotes. But that’s always been here already. That became pretty clear to me pretty fast.

I’m a bit skeptical about this argument because autocratic states love to hold practically fake and forced elections with 90 or 99 % approval and use that as justification.

I’m not sure even with a successful election and it going to the democrats we’ll be able to tell. At least from today’s view. It will largely depend on how institutions and the justice/court system can hold out against the current administration right now and during this phase.

I feel like they may have already created damage that won’t be cleared just from one election or one election period’s fixups.

At the same time, hopefully, this is the wake-up call for opposition and a transformation one way or another. It’s plainly obvious what is happening now, and I am hoping opposition will become more apparent and prevalent because of it. Not just in citizens, but institutions too.

What does PSL stand for?

I’ve seen it too often on Lemmy too.

Most are of what you describe, but not all of them. I have seen valuable background checks before (back on Reddit). I specifically remember an elaborate post about bots/botnet.

I don’t like your dismissive qualification of “have so little going on in their lives”. Some background checks are good and important. Dismissing people who are willing to invest into that in general, but also dismissing people who “have nothing better to do” for their situation, feels like an awful, uncalled-for, inappropriate insult.

/edit: Rewording to better get my point across.