• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    That is making the assumption that pornography and prostitution only exist because people need food and shelter.

    The rich porn stars (they do exist) would be a contradiction to this theory.

  • Mossy Feathers (She/Her)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    You forget about furry porn. Furries draw porn because we like it, not because we make money at it (but money allows those of us who do it to actually potentially live off it).

    Edit: or to put it another way, someone drew furry porn and discovered they could make money doing it, not the other way around.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wow I would have thought if everyone had food and shelter then we would have more pornography, not less. And I’d also wager we would have better quality porn too. Along with better quality of a lot of other things really