I have a folder of MP3s, some of which date back to 1999, just a few years after the format was popularised. Most of them have utterly terrible names (think RIDEONAM.MP3). I think at this point they might even survive the heat death of the universe. And they’ll still be terribly-organised.

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    13 hours ago

    hey now, they’re flac files and painstakingly sorted with the help of musicbrainz picard

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I also have that one folder of random shit that I’ve avoided sorting for the last 20 years.

        pff I have so many folders like that that I have folders for those kinds of folders. I should probably put those folders all into a single folder…

        • Wolf314159@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It’ll destroy all your painstakingly crafted and curated ID3 tags much faster than Picard. I’m not salty or anything. Anyway, the lesson for me was that music is simply too complicated from a library perspective to trust to highly-automated tools like beets. Picard kind of encourages you to go directory by directory and release by release, and that is a good thing. These days so are does most of the library stuff for newly added things, but I usually end up fixing it all basic to my standard with Picard later.

          • Noxy@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Yeah, definitely agreed. There are so many edge cases. I tend to put new downloads/purchases in an “intake” dir and then run that through picard, which then saves it at the final local storage path with whatever tags I decide to use