• jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    No it’s not, maybe for some mainstream websites. Saying the “whole internet” is clickbait hyperbole.

    • renrenPDX@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It’s about control. They can grant you access or revoke it based on your id.

      The powers at be hate that they can’t control the narrative as well as they used to so this is their solution.

  • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I think we need to organise a massive campaign for people to cancel their entire Isp for at least a month, I’m betting all this would get reversed almost overnight.

    Anything but that I fear they win and we all end up on the darknet.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Hahaha

      Good luck doing that.

      People can’t even delay their non-essential shinies to make a statement against price gouging/raising bullshit… You think they’re gonna willingly sacrifice something like internet? for a month?

    • TotalCourage007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I mean, wouldn’t lemmy qualify as darknet because it isn’t the top 10 websites? We should be growing the Federation anyways so I’m down for that. At least they won’t ban me for making Trump jokes.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 hours ago

        No, Darknet is just a website that’s not listed anywhere. Lemmy is listed in many places.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        If it doesnt show up on page 2 it doesnt exist lol

        I think thats more the deep web than the dark web 😄

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Not sure about what the norms are where you live, but most people in the US have to sign 1-year agreements for Internet service, and those who don’t typically either pay more or would pay before because they’re on a cheaper, older rate that is grandfathered in and is no longer offered by the Internet service provider.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          You can do that in the US as well, but it will cost more because you wouldn’t be agreeing to a fixed term. For example, my ISP charges $25 a month for 200 mb/s if you agree to a one-year term, but it’s $40 a month if you do not agree to a one-year term. And there’s also the added inconvenience of having to go to one of the ISP’s physical stores every month and put cash into their kiosk.

          They will ask for your name here when signing up, but nothing prevents you from lying about your name if you’re going to be paying in cash. They ask for an e-mail address as well, but you can say you haven’t got one, and they’ll create one for you using their own e-mail service and assign it to you. You don’t actually have to use it, but it is for receiving their bills and notices.

        • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It is so complicated that you’re both correct and incorrect. US government added to it, yes. I’d argue the fundamental work was independent researchers from multiple countries (UK, USA, France). I’d argue the critical infrastructure was multiple non-profits.

          Also the question is “what exactly is the beginning of the internet”. Is it usenet? Telnet? Arpanet?

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Uh huh. People are addicted. I’d bet even the people with petabyte home media systems will go into withdrawal within picoseconds after not being able to get more more more more more more

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Better would be to reject sites like reddit. Make them suffer instead.

  • Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    It’s fucking ironic that this article is asking me to register just to read it.

    Can was please fucking stop needing accounts to exist online? So fucking dumb

  • Oozy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Remember guys, they cared about the kids and their online safety as soon as Israel started a genocide in Gaza and they lost control of the narrative. But they didn’t care at all for the past 20 years when Epstein and his buddies were running rampant.

    edit: clarity

  • ard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    this is backwards. why can’t publishers mark pages as child-friendly and then browsers and operating systems can have a child-friendly mode that parents (or whoever the authoritarians are) can use. Laws can target people misusing the child-friendly mode.

      • nickiwest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 hours ago

        This is the correct answer. Notice that they have no compunction about punishing parents who secure gender-affirming care for their trans kids, but there has been zero discussion of holding parents responsible for their kids’ internet usage.

        Far-right groups in the US have been crying “Big Brother” about everything for years because their whole plan has been to create a surveillance state where to gather information about dissenters. Every accusation is a confession with these people.

  • danhab99@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Does anyone vaguely remember those internet licenses from that Star Trek DS9 episode when they went back in time but it was the near future from the 80s perspective meaning that it’s actually today?

    We’re going to have internet licenses soon

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This is why the Dark-web exists.

    • Tor
    • I2P
    • Yggdrasil
    • LokiNet
    • FreeNet
    • ZeroNet
    • GNUnet (In the distant future)

    Did I miss anything ?

  • MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    No one needs the internet outside of work. The moment I’m forced to show my ID or get my face scanned, I’m done for good.

    • itslola@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      No one needs the internet outside of work.

      As someone with a disability (and no car), the internet has played a massive role in allowing me to live independently, which in turn has a profoundly positive impact on my mental health. There are a wide variety of circumstances in which the internet has enhanced life experience - let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Lemmy is still very centralized, sure there are many servers and that takes care of the /u/spez problem but very little else, most topic generally have one big community and it’s on the one big server

        You can go elsewhere, if you like speaking into the void and nobody even hearing you.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        If they threaten server admins with legal action based on the global user count of lemmy rather than their local server user count I’m sure plenty of owners will fold.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Lemmy is probably not complying with UK law already. But if hosted outside the UK you can just ignore them.

          Some instances have blocked the UK but you can also just ignore it because wtf are they going to do

        • AlolanYoda@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Really? I haven’t really used Tor but I can’t find anything about that. What happened?

          • nyan@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Current US administration stopped funding it as part of their slide towards corporate-driven dystopia, I believe. Tor itself is still out there, just a little more strapped for cash than it used to be.

            • bskm@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Using it from time to time and hosting a relay. Works and has been improving over the years imo

  • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    If this happens they should check ID at church too seeing as how children are much more likely to be abused or groomed by someone there.