• Teknikal@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 minutes ago

    Not bothered if necessary Il patch every apk before installing it, one more stupid American move that will ultimately give the entire market to the Chinese.

  • 10001110101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Kinda depressing that all of big-tech seems to have given up “innovating” (finding applications for publicly-funded research), and have become rent-seeking dinosaurs.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      That would mean less money, at least in the short term, but also in the long term as it grants the user the autonomy of optionality, the power to choose some of Google’s edicts. Really it’s about the power to shape the choices of the users in the future. Take their power away. And in the future this will be conducive to leverage this power against the user for more money.

      I asked the AI about it, in case anyone is curious https://chatgpt.com/share/68454a70-5cd8-8005-8075-3579244f0ce4

  • viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This article is a thinly veiled ad paired with fearmongering to get gullible users to buy the shit phones they sell (or not, some people have been on “waitlists” for 5+ years after providing a full payment).

    Granted, their phones are fully open, but have next to no apps.

    Personally I’ll stick with Android 12, rooted, and see what the future brings.

    • anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Maybe you should curb your enthusiasm a bit. have you seen what it take to unlock the bootloader from most manufacturers? you might even need your grandma’s birth certificate before you’re allowed to do so in the future

      • kadup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Certainly depends on where you live.

        Unlocking a Samsung phone is trivial here.

      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I am aware, but what choices do we have? I for one stopped using banking apps in my Android phone, not a big deal, we didn’t have banking apps there pre 2007 right?

        I know not everyone can do it, but we can fight back in our own ways.

        And voting with your wallet should be an obvious statement at this point.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The restrictions on apk access over the past 10 years have already been an annoying pita. Many of the best power user apks have had to gut themselves over their original functionality, all while obtaining root access over your owned devices has become harder or next to impossible.

    • altphoto@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Let them keep those. I hereby declare that if I don’t own the thing, I ain’t buying it. So no root, no $$$.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yeah, but I still really like my micro SD card slot and pen on my note 20 ultra. Dunno what I’ll do when I have to replace it.

        • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          The pen is the only reason I have stuck with Samsung. If they made a Pixel with a smart pen that I could put GrapheneOS on I’d buy it in a second.

          • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Yeah. Id pick up a redmi 10+ pro if it had a pen and sacrifice away the SD card slot. Id at least have a huge battery and awesome cooling.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    In parallel, Google has rolled out its Play Integrity API, which allows developers to limit app functionality when sideloaded, effectively pushing users to install apps only through the Google Play Store.

    All of this while EU forbids Apple to do the same, what is the idea here? Measuring how EU reacts?

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Is it the same though? Google is allowing the developers to choose to prevent sideloading. I thought Apple’s issue was that they prevented side loading completely.

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    There is exactly one app I use that is available only on play store - my bank.

    I don’t really need the app.

    They have a website.

    I have a few phones, just got one that now has grapheneOS.

    I’ve been using it for a few weeks to see how it works before I switch over anything to use it as my main. it has a lot of very interesting privacy/security features to test out.

    Either way, I don’t get anything from the play store anymore.

    It’s F(L)OSS or a website.

    As god intended.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    23 hours ago

    From what I can tell, all of this shit is on Google versions of Android. If you are on AOSP such as lineage or graphene, from what I understand this has no effect whatsoever.

    • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      But this is not the only aspect of Google’s autocratization; Apps who’s developers have enabled the Google Play Integrity APIs will not run on custom roms.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I’m sorry, but in that case, it wasn’t worth running the app to begin with. You can either find a third-party app that lets you access the same content, such as Newpipe and YouTube, or you can use it from a web browser, such as your bank, and if you can’t do either of those, then just don’t fucking use that service.

        I was willing to totally switch banks because my previous bank required me to use a mobile app and I did not want to do so. If I must go through some annoyance to use something that works properly, I will.

        For me at least, running as much open source as I can possibly do is worth more than the inconvenience caused by not being able to use these shit services.

        • cmt@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I use open source whenever I can, but sometimes that just isn’t an option in the real world. I work in IT at a hospital that REQUIRES Duo. I use GrapheneOS. I was able to get it to work, but it was a horrible experience.

            • cmt@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              19 hours ago

              I did honestly think about this, but its honestly more trouble than it’s worth. Carrying around two phones is just kind of am eh experience, plus I’m new, and I don’t wanna be that guy. If I kept having issues with it, that is probably the route I would have ended up taking, but it’s working as expected now. I’m not a FOSS purest or anything either way. I have a librebooted thinkpad, but I also have several proprietary apps on my phone. Its all about usability for me.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        cool, any dev who requires that is acting in bad faith against my privacy and doesn’t deserve my support.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          The problem comes when it’s not an app you’re using for the app’s sake, but because it’s the app of some company you have a real-world relationship with. Your bank’s app being the most important one that comes to my mind, considering I’ve already heard about some banks trying to restrict users to only Google’s flavour of Android before this.

          • phx@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Honestly other than a fingerprint lock, I’ve found the apps suck compared to just a browser on a PC anyhow. Half the apps could just be webpages, and a bunch of those are just wrappers to a web rendering layer anyhow

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            22 hours ago

            and that’s important why? pick a different bank, or don’t use the app at all.

            I get that some folks think using the app is a requirement. that may be true for some but not all.

            don’t support shitty services and these companies won’t continue to abuse us.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Are they talking about the changes that were made that allow a dev to prevent their app from launching if it fails a Play integrity check?

    If so I don’t see that as a big deal since it is up to the dev to use it. OSS devs that want to distribute their app via apk download won’t enable it, and anyone distributing cracked apks will just disable that along with whatever other changes they are making.

    • KingRandomGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Some apps only require ‘basic’ play integrity verification, but now check to see if they’re installed via the Play Store. They refuse to run if they’re installed via an alternative source.

      This has been a problem for GrapheneOS, since some apps filter themselves out of the Play Store search if you don’t pass strong play integrity, despite the fact that they don’t require it. Luckily Graphene now had a bypass for this.