• RickSorkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Theirs is no condescension in my tone because there Is no “tone” in written word.

      I simply asked you a question you refused to answer, and then I refuted your reasoning for not answering.

      And it’s not a debate unless you participate.

      Next time, answer a question when asked. Take it as a prompt for you to sell your idea on someone who is looking to you for an answer.

            • RickSorkin@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Since you have seen fit to tell me my reason and purpose, it’s only fair I do the same.

              You had no intention to discuss this in good faith the moment you commented. And this is because you know too little on the subject to trust yourself to stand up against even the slightest scrutiny.

              You caved after single follow up question. And now you’re blaming me because you lack knowledge of, and commitment to the subject.

              Do better.

                • RickSorkin@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Okay bud. If it helps- I am profusely sorry for having asked you a question. I didn’t mean to upset you and I will flag you as “sensitive” so as to avoid this mistake in the future.

                  You have my deep and sincere apologies.