

Not super insightful, but this point is problematic.
turning tactical dominance into strategic success.
Were only told about tactical successes of Zionist supremacist side. Israel censors the damage it receives.
In Vietnam war “draw”, 1 US death to roughly 4-5 ARVN deaths and 18-20 North Vietnamese deaths from US accounting. If deaths of Israelis, and in modern metropolises of oppressive Gulf kingdoms were at that ratio, would it be a tactical success? Information control on losses provides an illusion of tactical dominance.
For Gulf states, if a nuclear threat forced US navy and TelAviv to agree to ceasefire, it would be a tactical and strategic victory.






US has longstanding tradition of protecting themselves, and of course bibi, from such options. This evil, and head of state assassination, was entirely intentional in order to ensure Iranians were more united to fight longer, and no option for ceasefire would exist. The ever more desperate shifts from reality in Trump demands seems like worrisome dementia or Israel handling inconsiderate of US sustainability.