recieve vs. receive

Are you okay with a self-hosted solution? If so, you could, for example, self-host FreshRSS ^[1], and then use it to scrape a feed using XPath ^[2]. I can elaborate further on the method if you are interested.

[…] There have been publicly released FBI powerpoint slides that link meshtastic radios to “extremist” groups. […]

Do you have a source, by chance?

IIRC, I did try that, but it caused my controller to cease functioning at all. Take that statement with a grain of salt though — I’d need to test again to verify.

I’m currently waiting for them to release a patch for it; my controller is a little fucked: The controller vibration seems to have stopped working. Also, it bugs out for me if I disconnect the controller when the game is running and reconnect: some of the buttons stop working.

UPDATE (2025-09-05T06:54Z): It turns out that the lack of controller rumble is fixable by forcing the use of Proton instead of running the native build ^[1].

[…] read how to read a book […]

Thank you for the recommendation 😊

I look at any individual’s history when they post anything sketchy and contextualize. […]

I am concerned that this would distill down to argumentum ad hominem.

[misinformation] is hardly an issue on this platform […]

In my opinion, that statement of yours is, ironically, responsible for why there may be an issue with misinformation. You state it with certainty, yet you provide no source to back up your claim. It is my belief that this sort of conjecture is at the source of misinformation issues.

What concrete steps can be taken to combat misinformation on social media? […]

Regarding my own content: I do my best to cite any claim that I make, no matter how trivial. If I make a statement for which I lack confidence in its veracity, I do my best to convey that uncertainty. I do my best to convey explicitly whether a statement is a joke, or sarcasm.

Fundamentally, my approach to this issue is based on this quote:

Rationality is not a character trait, it’s a process. If you fool yourself into believing that you’re rational by default, you open yourself up to the most irrational thinking. ^[1]

Regarding the content of others: If I come across something that I believe to be false, I try to politely respond to it with a sufficiently and honestly cited statement explaining why I think it is false. If I come across something of unknown veracity/clarity, I try to politely challenge the individual responsible to clarify their intent/meaning.

For clarity, I have no evidence to support that what I’m doing is an effective means to this end, but I want to believe that it’s helping in at least some small way.

What concrete steps can be taken to combat misinformation on social media?

Thanks! 😊

Thank you! 😊

Nope! I do it all manually; though, it can definitely be tedious at times. It has crossed my mind to write a script to automatically generate at least some of them (or even just some of their components), but I just haven’t gotten around to it yet.

Also, as a side note, the citation style is my own that I’ve been “developing”. I’m sort developing it as I use it.

I’m not sure if this exactly fits what you’re looking for, but the following 5 albums by The Dear Hunter are connected through a shared storyline ^[1]:

1. Act I: The Lake South, The River North ^[2]
2. Act II: The Meaning of, and All Things Regarding Ms. Leading ^[3]
3. Act III: Life and Death ^[4]
4. Act IV: Rebirth in Reprise ^[5]
5. Act V: Hymns with the Devil in Confessional ^[6]

In light of certain recent government regulations redefining “child” to mean anyone under the age of 18 […]

Do you mind citing a source for that?

Hm, while a witness’s testimony may be evidence, iiuc, it would only be one piece of evidence. I think what’s important is whether the evidence in question can be considered sufficient.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER! /j

Lemmy is mostly men […]

Has there been a recent survey?

[…] We should not believe absolutely anyone, regardless of gender, making any accusation. […]

Do you make a distinction between “accusation” and “testimony”?

[…] We trust [people] based on credibility and evidence. […]

I don’t think this is necessarily the case. For example, one could choose to give someone a chance despite their past wrongs.

[…] someone who has been declared a rapist by a court of law and has been convicted of many serious crimes should never be president of a country […]

IMO, I don’t think this is a good idea. My concern is that it may give one’s opposition an incentive to find a way to falsely convict them of a crime (or maybe create a new criminal offense) in order to remove them from the running for office.