No. Oddly enough I don’t support genocidal delusions of grandeur

Removed by mod

Yay me. Got my first comment removed on Lemmy.

What an honor, especially considering it broke none of listed rules here

Removed by mod

“With all due respect, throwing around the term genocide in relation to Gaza is deeply offensive to many Jewish people who have suffered actual genocides.

Yes, solid reasoning. New genocides can’t exist because there were old ones

Pretty sure there have been many genocides since WW2

Is this how we all get AIDS?

Obvious plot twist: he did not shoot himself

Makes me wonder what Ukraine could do to force mobilization without increasing (maybe even decreasing) Russian public support for the war

That seems like the quickest way to end the war favorably for Ukraine

Really? Sounds like it’s been there the whole time

Venison, and for the same reason as lamb

Spez has been laser focused on trying to make reddit profitable

His actions speak like he hired some kind of machiavellian ham fisted axe wielding corporate consultants to make that happen

…but at the same time, Spez also want to fully control the main political narrative on Reddit as another revenue stream

Probably a good thing they asked volunteers interested in the study to do it instead of someone such as yourself, who isn’t.

I remember the researcher saying that it took some time for the participants to get used to the routine of being mindful of their thoughts and journaling at the drop of a hat

I know I wouldn’t want to do that either

In addition to in-depth interviews, one of the primary methods used in the study was for volunteers to carry a timer that would go off randomly and they were to journal what they were thinking at the time

The thoughts of someone without an inner monologue are not the same as someone with an inner monologue

That doesn’t seem to bother the kind of people being described

All 50+ years of it?

Google is also an option

Correct, a lack of inner speech isn’t the same as an absence of thought

It just seems like a true shower thought requires a narration to get so incredibly off tangent that it amounts to more than a simple epiphany

Like Mitch Hedberg, he is a great example of someone who let their inner speech run free

Maybe other people have read this research before as I have

Maybe that’s what’s wrong with them

You don’t have to. It’s a thoroughly researched study, your belief in its existence is irrelevant.

Must be nice to be one of those lawyers