• 6 Posts
  • 586 Comments
Joined 6 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 31st, 2020

help-circle







  • Haha wow, my initial thought after reading your post was “signatures went away”, but then I figured I’m biased towards that being significant, because I recently was on an ancient forum that still had them.

    So, instead I tried to formulate the more abstract development. I had read about it a long time ago, so I did not pull that whole comment out of my arse just then, thankfully.

    But that it is then precisely signatures which elicit a reaction, that’s hilarious. 😅

    And yeah, I do not miss signatures. Within minutes of reading on that forum, I had grown a disdain for some users, because they’d respond with half a sentence and then a distracting GIF in their signature. And of course, they would respond multiple times to a topic, so you could get 10+ instances of that same GIF on one page.

    Unfortunately, this does mean I now need to demonstrate that by including a shitty signature:


    I’m not a signature, I just clean here. GIF of an emoticon wiping the floor.

    The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. ~ Sun Tzu

    Flashy GIF of some anime character blasting a gun towards the viewer. Don't ask me what it is, I literally just searched for "forum signature gif".


  • Not sure, I can articulate this thought well enough, but I feel like there’s been a split between “personal” and “impersonal” social media.

    Early internet forums were usually about some specific topic and pseudonyms were paramount, but each person was still given room to present themselves.
    So, what I mean by that, is that forum posts had signatures, big profile pictures, as well as typically some additional information about the user, like “Rank: Lord Supreme – Joined: March 2005 – Posts: 3 trillion”.
    The forums generally weren’t focused on the people, but you still knew the regulars.

    Then came Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Mastodon etc., which put people into the focus. You were discouraged from using pseudonyms. You were encouraged to post pictures of yourself. You were encouraged to broadcast any random thought you had.
    And while you can use these networks to read or talk about certain topics, you’re really supposed to follow people and get to know them.

    And then, sort of as a counter movement again, you have your “link aggregators”, i.e. Lemmy, Lobsters, Reddit etc…
    Discussions only happen when there’s a topic, i.e. a post, to talk about. You can’t just broadcast thoughts without context, but rather have to sort them into specific topics/communities.
    And while there’s a tiny profile picture next to posts and we do have some regulars that are more widely recognized, most users are not.




  • Yeah, was gonna be my suggestion, too. I get small white stains on specific fabrics and one of my shirts’ colors looked completely washed-out. And yeah, I can get rid of that with citric acid in what my washing machine calls “pre-wash”.

    I’m not sure, it was just leftover detergent for me, though, because while I could wash out some of it by hand-washing the clothes with water afterwards, a lot of it stayed. So, my assumption was that it’s actually just calcium build-up, which of course also goes away with acid.





  • I feel like this isn’t really a new development. Back when LAN parties and local multiplayer were still a thing, games like TeeWorlds, Worms etc. were popular, because they ran on potatoes and you could often get them for free.

    The actual fun then came from dicking around with or competing against your friends. The game itself does not need to be ground-breaking for that.

    Hell, it technically started even earlier than that, with physical card games and board games and such. Just play them with friends and it’s fun.




  • I mean, I don’t have a ton of skin in the game here, as I don’t care much for horror games either way.
    But yeah, I just assume that they say they’re cautious to calm the fans, but they actually can’t be cautious, since well, they can only really delay by a whole year at a time, and if they do that, then they have two games in the year afterwards.

    They did only pre-plan a handful of years, so maybe they can just delay the following games by a year each, too.

    But yeah, it still just sounds like the decision-making here isn’t driven by logic or what allows publishing good games, but rather by
    Mr. Krabs meme, where he says "Hello, I like money!".