Mozilla’s system only measures the success rate of ads—it doesn’t help companies target those ads—and it’s less susceptible to abuse, EFF’s Lena Cohen told @FastCompany@flipboard.com. “It’s much more privacy-preserving than Google’s version of the same feature.”

https://mastodon.social/@eff/112922761259324925

Privacy experts say the new toggle is mostly harmless, but Firefox users saw it as a betrayal.

“They made this technology for advertisers, specifically,” says Jonah Aragon, founder of the Privacy Guides website. “There’s no direct benefit to the user in creating this. It’s software that only serves a party other than the user.”

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    There’s no reason why open source software should cater to advertisers.

    Advertising is a plague on humanity. If we have to rethink our digital economics to fix it, then so be it.

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I mean, go ahead, rethink our digital economics. While we wait for that, what do we do in the meantime?

      (And of note: Mozilla itself has launched several initiatives there as well (example), but none have panned out so far.)

        • Vincent@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Mozilla doesn’t monetise this; the whole point is to change the ecosystem to enable more privacy. It’s not a moneygrab.

            • Vincent@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Tell me, what data about you does anyone get? And why is there no benefit to legitimate advertisers who will be able to know which of their ads have resulted in sales, even if they don’t know anything about you specifically?

              The draw for privacy-invasive ones indeed needs a couple of extra steps, which requires being able to see the long-term vision: having a privacy-friendly alternative available enables both legislators to enact stricter legislation, as well as decrease the incentive to keep engaging in the cat-and-mouse game with browsers, trying to find new way to violate people’s privacy.

                • Vincent@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Sorry, I meant: what data does anyone get through this new capability? Mozilla could always get your IP address and other connection data when e.g. Firefox checks for updates, or add-ons, or safebrowsing lists, etc. Could you name one or two things that are part of “all the advertisement telemetry” that is new?

                  Because advertisers already have better options.

                  Better in the sense that they provide the same information with privacy guarantees that are just as good?

                  Also, why do you need a guaranteed privacy increase? Why would we want to miss “opportunity to get us a future with improved privacy for everyone”?