Next year I’m turning 50 & also become eligible for retirement. Retirement age in my country for the general population (men) is 65, but the judiciary has separate rules. I’m seriously considering retirement but I have older colleagues who are still working because they say with the life expectancy rising who knows how much that great pension in the present will be worth in the future, so why not keep it going for an additional source of income?

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I would retire if the math makes sense. A great pension in the future doesn’t help if you’re too old to enjoy life.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    31 minutes ago

    I mean it depends entirely upon your situation and what kind of work you’re doing and how you enjoy it? Though certainly it’s a bad time for people with Integrity to be leaving the Judiciary, basically worldwide.

  • philpo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If you like your work? Keep working. The demographic bubble is gonna burst all over the world and that will indeed make pensions unstable.

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    41 minutes ago

    If you’re not sure, you could go another 5 to fortify your retirement. I obviously don’t know how your specific pension is structured, but with early retirees who got their via investing in index funds (e.g. in a 401K) even pushing retirement back a few years can make a really big difference in the numbers.

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    If I was in your shoes, I’d wait for some important issue to come up, and then retire in protest. Make it meaningful enough and you might create something of a legacy.

  • onoki@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I have been thinking something similar recently for another reason. I think your colleagues have a great point, but if you say that you would be able to live with your pension right now, it might make sense to work few more years, but less than the remaining 16. Here’s how I approached the topic.

    1. Think about how much money you need for living. Including the money for hobbies etc. Many people need more hobby money if they have more spare time.

    2. Estimate the effects of inflation and other new costs (e.g. needing more health care than currently). I.e. how does the answer to (1) likely change in the upcoming years?

    3. Estimate your income for the remainder of your expected life. Do you have any stocks? Is there no inflation factor in the pension?

    4. Enter all of the above to Excel. You will find the spot which will likely allow you to have a comfortable retirement for the remainder of your good years. And if you are pessimistic about inflation or something else, you can easily adjust any buffers in the calculation.

    For me that age will be a more than 50, but certainly lower than the average retirement age in my country. The freedom to choose to voluntarily do work or hobbies is a much more preferrable to me than having to go to work every day.

    • sweatking@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      I think my colleagues are also a bit greedy. Our pensions are already way more than generous, to the point where there’s a whole discourse about it & calls (and tries) for reform in our country. For reference, this year the average pension for a judge/prosecutor was around 5000€ net per month.

    • frizzo@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      What hobbies do 65 year old have? Besides Drinking decaf coffee and checking the obituaries for friends? Just a thought.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    alot of retirees are still working. even some that retired around 55-60s. it just not enough income on RETIREMENT alone, unless you are RICH or well off, i had some “retired” uncle/aunts in thier 50s-60s that are doing stocks/investments instead carefully.

    with the off chance if you someone that is spending beyond thier means, and one other person is the sole breadwinner(like parents, one is overspending and hoarding and the other is apushover , it wont be enough.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    If it means continuing an/my OK career where I can work from home, I’d probably keep working to a limited extent because:

    1. I need to keep busy

    2. The extra money is always nice

    If it involves showing up somewhere I hate, then probably not.