• reddifuge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Ai has a proven track record of causing less accidents, and killing far fewer animals per km traveled than the average driver.

    92% fewer accidents involving animals than the average human.

    Ai doesn’t drink, get distracted, or smoke meth like the ml mods.

      • Kissaki@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 hours ago

        People get jail time, what do we do with machines?

        Hold the manufacturers and operators (specifically for company operated) accountable?

        The machine is the product, not the operator. We don’t jail classic cars either. We hold their operators accountable. The one in control. Self driving has a shift of who is in control - now “indirectly”.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Hold the manufacturers and operators (specifically for company operated) accountable?

          if only that were the truth.

          these companies will attempt to settle for bottom dollar or drag it out so long you’ll have to go homeless to pay the legal fees.

          there is no justice left in the legal system. justice isn’t just blind anymore, she’s been decapitated.

          • saimen@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            So in conclusion, it’s not AI that’s the problem it’s the legal system?

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      here you dropped this

      per capita

      your figures (though I doubt them) don’t include the skew of driver vs driverless vehicles. of course driverless cars are 92% less likely to have an accident involving animals. that’s because driverless cars account for less than 1% of the entire vehicle population.

      Ai doesn’t drink, get distracted, or smoke meth like the ml mods.

      but it does randomly hallucinate.

      • reddifuge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        My numbers are per km traveled, as stated. Capita is irrelevant.

        Hallucinations aren’t random, they are programmed in. They reward LLMs for guessing. Driving AI is not trained this way.

        Nice misinformation and lack of understanding on what capita is.

        This is really basic stuff.

          • LwL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Maybe if you didn’t regurgitate criticisms of LLMs as being applicable to car driving AI you could construct an actual argument.

            Driving AI has been shown to be very flawed (e.g. driving into a loony-tunes-esque painted canvas) and I’d be willing to bet that hitting small animals is also something they can’t avoid as reliably because it’s just not a profitable decision to do that, and capitalism-ho

            You don’t have to bring up hallucinations (irrelevant to driving AI that’s an LLM thing, for driving AI that’d just be plain unreliability) or start insulting people because you don’t like the (mutually unsourced) statistics claims.

          • reddifuge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            I love how mad you get when you realize how wrong you are.

            Lash out more.

              • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                49 minutes ago

                “Could I be wrong in my assertion…? NO! It’s people trolling me!”

                Did you know self-driving cars have to report every deviation to USDOT? That includes incidents like if a driverless truck is driving at 55mph by itself on an otherwise deserted and clear stretch of rural highway and a bird flies out in front of it, that ends up on a spreadsheet somewhere. Could your driving skills survive that level of scrutiny?