• M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    There is a 1000 hp tesla with 3 motors that all together weights about 450 killograms, this seems to support your idea until you look at how much the batteries weigh…

    The batteries are 550 kilograms to start, and are generally considered to not be big enough. So yeah, great they solved the issue that no EV had (EVs always had lighter motors, and very heavy batteries).

    Edit: The 1000 hp telsa is 2200 Kg total, so yeah this would cut out 400 ish Kgs (assuming cooling and inverter and all that) from the total, not nothing but not really a game changer ether. Also 1000 Hp engine is stupid and not needed, maybe if it was a 200 Hp version but then also that would be diminishing returns as this motor would be what 4 kgs?

    • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Making the motor lighter gives weight allowance for the onboard BESS. This could allow more batteries to be installed on the same car, increasing range and power/torque, so long as the volume of the car allows that same BESS increase.

      It’s still good progress. I don’t understand your POV where we must focus on the BESS first and make that more efficient, both in terms of weight, volume, power, and energy, then move on to other things.

      We can do that in parallel and see faster improvements.

    • Blum0108@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      ~20% weight reduction for a total vehicle weight isn’t small change. Plus batteries will continue to improve as well. Do you just get off on being negative?

        • Dave.@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The gains compound a bit too, 20 percent less weight equals proportionally less battery capacity required to shift the now-lighter vehicle from point A to point B.

          So then you can cut the size of the battery while maintaining the same range, and that’s where you start to get significant overall weight and cost savings.

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Hell just replace the former motor weight with battery and you’ve almost doubled the range. If China ever mass produces solid state batteries, double it again.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Put the big battery pack (and maybe an ICE powered generator + fuel) on a trailer for cruising, then have a “ditch trailer and escape” button for that 20 mile sprint at the end of the trip.