• QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    That thing sounds like it needs a functioning internet and communications system. If society collapses I wouldn’t bet on the blockchain being usable.

    • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      And gold? A huge percentage of which people hold non-physically?

      It’s almost like you can come up with arguments that NOTHING is safe without a functioning internet and communications system.

      So…what’s the difference here?

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Do most people have bars of gold sitting around? No. Do most people have gold jewelry like wedding rings and earrings and necklaces? Yes. Can those bars of gold sitting in banks be easily melted down into coins in the event of a society collapse? Yes. Can Bitcoin be usable at all without internet and power? No.

        • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Hmmmm, so in this collapse scenario, there’s no internet or electricity, but somehow the infrastructure for melting gold, and the manufacture of things that require gold, just…keeps on ticking?

      • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I have gold and can transport it. We traded gold before we had an international banking structure. We don’t need electricity or the internet for the trade in gold.

        Crypto has no utility. It cannot be transported as it isn’t a physical asset. It cannot be used for any other purpose eg you can’t make a hat out of BTC or ETH. Gold and crypto are not the same when it comes to their usability as a currency.

        • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          No they’re not the same, you’re correct. You’re totally incorrect that it has no utility. You honestly just don’t understand how it actually works. I really, strongly suggest understanding

          • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I have spent 15 years following crypto. I promise you that I know how it works. The fact is the fanboys are the ones who are mistaken as so much of that scene is built by people who either know fuckall about currency policy or are scammers.

            • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Just to hold you accountable, kindly give me a brief explanation of how bitcoin works. If you know how it works, you should be able to explain it, and if you use Google to explain it for you, you’ll defeat your own argument. So please, try if you don’t mind?

              • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                29 seconds ago

                Lol sorry buddy but that’s true. Followed crypto for 15 years and the space is filled with guys who never took an economics course