• jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Everyone here is either on the side of hating big AI companies or hating IP law. I proudly hate both.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s a “heads-I-win / tails-you-lose” system when business can violently extract the value of labor coming and going.

      Either the state protects owners of IP (inevitably a business entity looking to collect rents on its use) or it facilitates robbing the original artist (inevitably a talented individual/team that lacks the money for a lengthy legal fight). The legal system never seems to break in favor of the people themselves. It can only exist as a gradient to move wealth from the sweet of one’s brow to the pocket of one’s bosses.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 hours ago

      We need two things:

      1. much shorter copyright and patent durations, like 14 and 5 years respectively (14 comes from OG copyright duration)
      2. stronger enforcement of copyright to protect creators from AI stealing their work

      They should happen in that order, and ideally copyright would only be awarded to individuals (or perhaps specifically named lists of individuals, with some reasonable cap), not corporations. The current system is absolutely bonkers.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Making it so corporations cannot directly own some random valuable thing?

        It’s a nice thing to think about, but it has 0% chance of happening in our current system.