Original source, including in-depth tests and other fancy details of the CPU used in the MAXHUB PC itself (written in Mandarin): https://news.mydrivers.com/1/1070/1070803_all.htm
CPU-Z Single-Core Benchmark and specs from the original source:
That’s an 8-core, ~3GHz Base Speed, 32MB L3 cache CPU for the number-crunchers around here.
On the surface, this CPU seems like it’s best suited for general desktop and office use, to see it adopted to a PC build product geared for “AI workloads” is interesting. If I’m not mistaken, AI performance is heavily dependent on the GPU rather than on the CPU, so I think that’s fine:
In terms of performance, the MAXHUB’s AI+ desktop computer is claimed to play 1080P 30fps and 4K 30fps high-bitrate online videos with decent CPU utilization numbers, showing that the KX-7000 CPU acts decently with media workload. Of course, when compared against competitors like Intel or AMD, Zhaoxin is behind, but the key motive here to create an ecosystem that relies entirely on in-house products, and this has apparently happened here.
And that’s a good thing, lol.
A 9800X3D gets ~820 single thread and ~8600 multithread. So its 41% the speed on single thread and 30% multithreaded. That is more than a decade out of date still a long way to go.
They’re just entering a market owned by a few big players. One simply can’t come out with a high end product out of nowhere. Maybe it’s not even the goal
The multithreaded performance is comparable to a Ryzen 7 from a few years ago. It ain’t bad at all. It all comes to price and power efficiency; and for many governments the lack of possible CIA backdoors is another plus.
Removed by mod
Sure, it won’t beat high-end CPUs from Intel/AMD, but a decade ago is somewhere between 4-6th gen of Core CPUs.
That’s more than enough for an average user’s Facebook machine (or WeChat probably in this case)
this used to be the market segment that cyrix used to fill and i hope that this doesn’t end up the same way.
It’s VIA, these chips are the modern Cyrix CPUs.
history really does keep repeating itself and i hope via learned a lot of lessons from the last time they tried to get into this market.
now, if only they could bring back emachines while they’re at it. lol
Unless you explicitly need x86, it’s a bad part.
Loongson3A is much faster and cheaper.
If we’re to compare this entry-level CPU clearly designed by a newcomer company and honed for one or two niches, to the current top-of-the-line, catch-all CPU backed by a brand that has had decades in the processor game, then yeah obviously it’s not going to fare well. There’s still some merit to this type of CPU (like say, if the price is right) and it could pave the way for better iterations.
We don’t make the same comparison for the quality & efficiency of healthcare in the brands’ respective countries, now do we? :)
It’s VIA, they’re been around since the dawn of time.
Oh, right 🤦♂️… I missed the mark on that one. Point is, the CPU is pretty good for its intended audience and usecases.
Does it matter much, x86/x64 is on its way out. Everyone has to jump on the ARM train or get left behind.
I expect everyone will be jumping on RISCV which is an open architecture. China is already developing a high performance architecture based on this https://github.com/OpenXiangShan/XiangShan
I imagine x86 is being developed as an intermittent compatibility measure to support current tech stack in case supplies from the US are cut off.
I tend to agree. But in the same way as hard drives have been on the way out for like a decade now, and I’d expect them to still have use cases decades in the future.
They will be useful for industry and business that uses software that won’t run on ARM systems. Just like there are places that use DOS to this day.