EDITED TO MAKE THE TITLE MORE APPROPRIATE. The previous title of this post was “I need to tell you something unsatisfying: your personal consumption choices will not make a meaningful difference to the amount of enshittification you experience in your life” which was the slug line as it appeared in my mailing-list-to-RSS reader. Although this is the first paragraph of the linked essay, it does not do a good job of explaining the thrust of the essay, and some people (not you though) seem to be arguing with the title instead of the essay.

(Thanks to ski11erboi@lemmy.world for the heads up.)

END OF EDITED SECTION

Here’s why you’re getting enshittified: we deliberately decided to stop enforcing competition laws. As a result, companies formed monopolies and cartels. This means that they don’t have to worry about losing your business or labor to a competitor, because they don’t compete. It also means that they can handily capture their regulators, because they can easily agree on a set of policy priorities and use the billions they’ve amassed by not competing to capture their regulators. They can hold a whip hand over their formerly powerful tech workers, mass-firing them and terrorizing them out of any Tron-inspired conceits about “fighting for the user.” Finally, they can use IP law to shut down anyone who makes technology that disenshittifies their offerings.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    First, it looks like this may be a dressed up advertisement for their newly released book:

    My book on Enshittification is coming out in a couple of months, and the early reviews are already coming in, and they are gratifyingly glowing.

    That fact alone doesn’t discount their argument, but it should be considered.

    Second, I disagree with this premise of the author:

    Because this isn’t an individual problem, it’s a systemic one.

    I disagree, its both.

    As the author rightly identifies, there are somethings that are only addressable systemically such as healthcare of mass transport. However a whole other host of items the author references are absolutely individual problems. Example from the author:

    When all your friends are going to a festival, are you really going to opt out because the event requires you to use the Ticketmaster app (because Ticketmaster has a monopoly over event ticketing)?

    Yes, I opt-out of nearly every Ticketmaster event. It is an individual problem with an individual solution.

    If so, you’re not gonna have a lot of friends, which is a pretty shitty way to live.

    My friends largely also opt out. Perhaps we self select for like-mindedness.

    This means that they don’t have to worry about losing your business or labor to a competitor, because they don’t compete.

    They can still lose my business if I opt out of the entire industry, such as corporate social media. No amount of competitors changes my mind on that. This could also be done on streaming services, choosing to read instead etc.

    This isn’t just a systemic problem as the author suggests.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Your assessment is spot on.

      If so, you’re not gonna have a lot of friends, which is a pretty shitty way to live.

      Or you choose friends who will stay your friends even if you miss a concert???

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I would argue that, if that is a requisite for them being your friends, they are not your friends. Win - win.

    • Sundray@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      First, it looks like this may be a dressed up advertisement for their newly released book:

      To be fair, this is a web archive of Cory Doctorow’s email newsletter, normally sent to a self-selecting audience that expects to see Cory try to sell us his stuff. But also, as the coiner of “enshittification” this is a subject he’s been examining for many years.