Israel’s war in Gaza is chipping away at so much of what we – in the United States but also internationally – had agreed upon as acceptable, from the rules governing our freedom of speech to the very laws of armed conflict. It seems no exaggeration to say that the foundation of the international order of the last 77 years is threatened by this change in the obligations governing our legal and political responsibilities to each other.

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Zionism is a destructive toxic ideology of fascistic bloodlust and racial supremacy. It is the true descendent of Nazi ideology.

    • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Given that the Zionist movement was founded decades before the Nazi movement, I would say Nazis are the descendants.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        More accurately, they’re both separate descendants of ethnonationalism which was a popular ideology at that time. And still today, evidently, though it seemed to be in decline for a bit during the post-war period.

      • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Well, 19th century zionism was a different thing. Optionally but not necessarily evil. Sometimes it was as benign as ‘lets all go somewhere and join a community together ajd bring the ways that we’re cool to that community and even if they dont totally like us, they can’t hate us more than these assholes’.

        So it is fair to say that the idea of zionism that ‘won’, the genocidal theocratic ethnostate, is at least to some extent based on both the nazis, and some of the same esoteric bs the nazis were into.

        • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It was always about stealing local people land and displace them

          Herzl’s Diary, 12 June 1895

          The property owners will come over to our side. According to my conception, the majority of the local population will have to be transferred elsewhere.

          We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it any employment in our own country. - Herzl’s Diary, 12 June 1895

          Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly - Herzl’s Diary, 12 June 1895

      • madlian@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Nazis had nothing to do with the Jewish people establishing a homeland in Palestine. Joining those two groups is ridiculous and rude to Jewish people.

        The Jewish people began by buying the land legally in the late 1800s as a way to escape persecution. That pissed off the local Arabs (understandably) and both of them started arguing—which was not usually violent until 1920-30ish.

        That said, after it became a British Mandate (1917), Israel got a ton of international support. And obviously after WWII, they got whatever they wanted…. Which, was choosing violence.

        A lot of the reason the Arabs got little support was because they were fragmented, with no leadership. Each of their revolts were seen as a threat and not a legitimate push back against colonization. And, after the Ottoman Empire fell, England and France “stole” that land, so revolts were more or less terrorism (in their eyes, of course).

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          The Jewish people began by buying the land legally in the late 1800s as a way to escape persecution.

          This is completely ignoring the boycott and parallel society angle. What Zionists did in pre-mandate Palestine was also forced expulsion of Palestinians; the forcing part was simply delegated to the state. Had they simply wanted to settle in Palestine nobody would’ve minded, but that was fundamentally not what the Zionist project was.

          According to Israeli historian Benny Morris, Zionism was inherently expansionist and always had the goal of turning the entirety of Palestine into a Jewish state. In addition, Morris describes the Zionists as intent on politically and physically dispossessing the Arabs.

          The World Zionist Organization established the Jewish National Fund (JNF) in 1901, with the stated goal “to redeem the land of Palestine as the inalienable possession of the Jewish people.” The notion of land “redemption” entailed that the land could not be sold and could not be leased to a non-Jew nor should the land be worked by Arabs.[145] The land purchased was primarily from absentee landlords, and upon purchase of the land, the tenant farmers who traditionally had rights of usufruct were often expelled.

          -Wikipedia

          Nazis had nothing to do with the Jewish people establishing a homeland in Palestine.

          Nazism had a lot to do with the German people expanding their homeland to Eastern Europe and Russia and murdering the inhabitants. Starting to see the similarities now? Nazism and Zionism are sister ideologies, both fruits from the same rotten tree that is European settler colonialism.

          • madlian@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Anyone could argue that “my people deserve this” is a similar ideology. That’s just false equivalence. You are cherry picking, and ignoring a whole lot of history and intention.

            Has Israel moved towards a similar ideology? Yes. But to claim in started out with that intent is just angry jaw flapping.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Anyone could argue that “my people deserve this” is a similar ideology.

              “My people deserve this land at the expense of its current inhabitants” is fascism, or at least the underpinning thereof, so you’re not wrong there. Nazism, Zionism, Manifest Destiny, it is literally the same thing manifesting in different ways. Look up “blood and soil” and “Lebensraum”. Ben Gurion is literally on record saying “we must remove the Arabs and take their place”. The Nakba started before the founding of Israel. If you have an argument for how the Nakba was anything but fascism, let’s hear it, but so far you’re not saying anything of substance.

              But to claim in started out with that intent is just angry jaw flapping.

              Okay let’s try this. Try this online quiz and see if you can get more than 15/21.

              • madlian@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                19 hours ago

                It’s really easy to cherry pick similar statements from people and compare them and make a whole website. Anyone could do the exact opposite.

                If you’re going to quote people, you need to use dates because as I have said before dates matter.

                • tiny_iota@endlesstalk.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  who bombed the king david hotel again and became leaders of israel? was it the palestinians? No?

                  Gee and its a wonder why they aren’t called terrorists. Could it be, could be it be racism and colonialism?

                • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  Ben Gurion’s is 1937.

                  It’s really easy to cherry pick similar statements from people and compare them and make a whole website.

                  My dude non-fascists don’t say “when we settle [region], [group] will have no choice but to scurry like drugged cockroaches” (dated 1983 btw). Also the site has dates and sources for the quotes; most Zionist quotes are recent but a few are from the 20th century with two from before WWI. They even have one by Herzl himself. Zionism was and continues to use and be predicated on downright Nazi antisemitic propaganda about how Jews can never live with non-Jews and how diaspora Jews are sickly and weak and all that shit. That’s why they shit on Holocaust victims, for instance.

                  • madlian@lemmy.cafe
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    1937 is how many years after 1897? Have I not been saying this entire time that the original idea was lost? Yes… pretty sure I did… yup checked I did.

                    My dude? Okay have a good day if you’re going to talk like that.

        • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Nazis had nothing to do with the Jewish people establishing a homeland in Palestine

          They actually had a huge amount to do with the creation of Isreal, actively encouraging and facilitating the movement of German Jews there.

          • madlian@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            20 hours ago

            The result of the persecution against the Jews resulted in an influx of them going down there. However, the persecution was long before World War II and the Nazis did not directly assist that migration and therefore comparing the two groups as a team or descendants is offensive.

            Facts:

            • Zionism happened before Nazism.
            • The migration of Jewish people to Palestine began long before WWII.
            • The only thing the Nazis did was speed up that migration and establish international sympathy for the Jewish people.

            Now, if you’re saying Israel today is Nazi-like… then yeah I agree completely.

        • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Zionists are similar tool of oppressiom to nazis

          The Jewish people began by buying the land legally in the late 1800s as a way to escape persecution. That pissed off the local Arabs (understandably) and both of them started arguing—which was not usually violent until 1920-30ish

          Arab was pissed of when the zionists plan became clear. Owning lands do not give you right to declare a state

          There was a group of Yemeni jews who settled in palestine and people was fine with them. Arabs and those jews was going to each other festivities.

          • madlian@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            20 hours ago

            The state declaration was in 1948. Zionism was established in 1897.

            That leaves 51 years for things to go wrong—and they did.

            If things got pretty bad around 1920, that’s just a few years after Britain put its dirty cock in the mix. And I think we can both agree British colonialism has been the cause of a ton of problems.

            Zionism was a solution to Jewish statelessness and persecution. In its early conception, Zionism was not a tool of oppression, but rather a form of self-determination.

            Did Zionism become a genocidal maniac? Yes.

            • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              Zionism was a solution to Jewish statelessness and persecution. In its early conception, Zionism was not a tool of oppression, but rather a form of self-determination.

              Zionists had no right to impose a state in any country. Even if the state was in Argentine or Japan or the USA, the population would have not accepted either. Facing a persecution is not a valid argument against imposing a state on the land of people who had nothing to do with the oppression .

              No matter how peaceful the ideology started , fact is fact Zionism became violent and is the source of the whole conflicts with the help of the British empire.

              • madlian@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                19 hours ago

                I agree with you. Zionism did not start out similar to Nazism, and overtime, with the help of the British government, it became something significantly terrible and has lost all focus of the original intention: to escape persecution.

                And… over years there have been more and more Pointless deaths – mostly caused by Israel. And in 2025, I don’t think anyone could argue against it being full on genocide against non-Jewish people in Palestine.

                • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  lost all focus of the original intention: to escape persecution.

                  They could have escaped percussion and live as normal citizens of Palestine but no the plan of Herzl was always to impose a state and displace the local population

                  Herzl’s Diary, 12 June 1895

                  The property owners will come over to our side. According to my conception, the majority of the local population will have to be transferred elsewhere.

                  We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it any employment in our own country. - Herzl’s Diary, 12 June 1895

                  Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly - Herzl’s Diary, 12 June 1895

                  Nazi was quickly in position of power so they was able to execute their plan very fast at first Nazism exclusion, discrimination, and the removal of Jews from German society then the final solution and the holocaust . Zionism needed more time to do it. Now in 2025 we are in the final stage of Zionism , the complete eradication of Palestinians in Gaza and slowly continuing eating the west bank

                  The Nazis were doing mass shooting, the IDF did mass shooting and mass bombing. Both the Nazis and the idf are starving people. The Nazis used gas chambers, the idf is shooting at people seeking aids with the new terrorist organization claiming to be an aid organization.

                  I am not saying both are equally the same and that the genocide in Gaza is worse than the holocaust but i think it is still fair to compare both rhetoric and methods