had a good view at least

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sure, but I’d still argue that the vast majority of flats people get would have been avoided by running tubeless. I’ve fixed around 8 punctures over the past 10,000km and only one of them was such that tire sealant wouldn’t have fixed.

      • 𝕮𝕬𝕭𝕭𝕬𝕲𝕰@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Fair enough - I suppose it’s a caution borne out of experience of the awful roads by me - I’ve had a lot of unsealable punctures on the roads near me (from gashes to a bit of glass that wiggled around just enough to not seal).

        As a result I always caveat advice to go tubeless - for “proper” punctures (anything more serious than a pin prick or snakebite) tubeless can be a can of worms, and give people a sense of confidence that inner tube users don’t have (wisely).

        Granted it’s also down to tyre choice (you can pry my patched panaracers from my cold dead hands) but a tyre pissing sealant and air is much more of a hassle to deal with than an inner tube in my experience.