Wow haven’t seen claims Russia would surrender, sounds like a far cry
It was “Ukraine is on the verge of losing each second but a few weapons can keep their head above water until a peace is negotiated”
Though the weapons have been sent with the premise that Ukraine has been losing
It’s definitely fishy with sabotaging all around from different directions with all of the negotiation attemps
We gotta wonder whose benefit it is to keep on prolonging while the official story is different
Why only now, what’s the benefit of keeping it on before
That nobody is ending it
It’s weird it’s taking so long huh
Every media has been saying that Ukraine is losing for 10½ years now, but nobody capable is willing to end the situation
It seems the libs were left out. Auth-conservative Macron chose to continue as is
Exactly, we should assume that any international representation is not transparent
Sources like The Guardian, Reuters, Telegraph, CNN, BBC are sometimes allowed and sometimes removed on rule 1.
The latter case is usually evident while lurking and finding a deep long comment thread. Sometimes one user there has deleted messages and there’s another’s rule 3 content comments left. Apparently these cases seem to usually be mutual rule 3 but it looks like they’re treated differently.
It is somewhat opaque how sometimes the rules apply and sometimes they don’t, like news sources on rule 1, and iirc rule 3 in general. Deleting content should have the mod informing the user and the rest community what happened and have a way for the users to manage mistakes, be it either accidental rule breaks by the user or wrongful modding.
Always the same map