

i agree with the headline. strongly. didn’t read the article.
btw is tech dirt still funded by (one of) Koch bros?
edit: honestly, just checking. won’t complain, whatever the answer.
i agree with the headline. strongly. didn’t read the article.
btw is tech dirt still funded by (one of) Koch bros?
edit: honestly, just checking. won’t complain, whatever the answer.
yeah, on graphene.
hmm can’t find mention of a bug for this combination. barely even the two mentioned in the same webpage.
Lemmy and Molly (foss) are the most addictive. 🤣🤣
vehemently agree!
i agree with wanting see more of tab title. for people who regularly keep 50+ tabs open, that is a pipe dream.
if tabs are so many that their iconized anyway, making the tab bar vertical and iconized isn’t much difference.
and if the bar would expand on hover (hopefully in near future), like in Brave (not sure if it’s a Chrome feature), then it can be wide enough to see plenty of title without reducing the webpage size most of the time.
this is the most balanced policy.
I’m not sure why it seems no one else is recommending this type of backup-for-rainy-day strategy.
I’ve been trying ironfox but it crashes when i tap “customize homepage”
have you experienced this?
here we go again…
Viva C*****!
by moving to a different employer, i guess.
did you mean by betraying coworkers? maybe some people like that idea. I’m strongly against it.
either way, i would avoid such a company.
afaik “lockdown mode” shortcut is a basic feature in android. it quickly disables fingerprint/face/etc unlock, temporarily.
it should still be present in some form in most versions of android since several years ago.
if you can’t find it in your power button long press menu, check the Lineage documentation.
btw powering off the device should also force password/pin unlock on the next boot.
seems like companies who know what proton is, would have no problem with it. some of their people would use it themselves.
companies who never heard of it wouldn’t have any bad impression about it.
if they never heard about it but are wary/scared of everything they never heard of, might not be safe to work there. that’s the kind of place that would test their workers’ loyalty randomly, and not reciprocate any loyalty they receive.
it was difficult writing it too…
I’m USAian. (just identifying for this thread, i don’t call myself that)
would “gringo” include Black USAians? Asian USAians? Spain-born USAians?
from my understanding of “gringo”, that doesn’t seem to include non-white USAians. Most English monolingual USAians think that means “white guy”.
a lot of gen z USAians might not know the word Yankee as a term for USAians. if speaking to them, you might have to explain it’s not the baseball team.
maybe it’s better to stick with “USAians”. it’s never been used but it’s easy to figure out. other possible choices are:
better yet, call each of us by the state we’re each from. that’s the safest bet. you know all our 50 state names right? and their official demonyms? 🤣 kidding
considering this and @Die4Ever@programming.dev’s comment, could it incentivize certain types of prospective Admins to create community only instances, increasing attraction of more users to lemmy overall but disproportionally burden the user management workload on the traditional user+community instances?
So my understanding from reading this (and other threads on Lemmy) is that:
-A majority of Lemmy users would rather the userbase remained small (in comparison to corporate social media and even compared to Mastodon).
-And a small but vocal minority wants to grow Lemmy to the point of being at least one of the choices, if not the de facto preferred alternative, on the mind of most Redditors who are sick of Reddit.
Is that accurate?
edit: formatting
maybe it’s caused by graphene+ironfox+some other setting or other app