Yes it is. It’s the one you got. Congrats on maintaining your ideological purity. It’s going to be quite a show.

Removed by mod

No one knows what you’re talking about.

My government provides more aid to foreign citizens than they do to canadians

Want to explain? Or should I just take your word for it?

Why are you like this

Some people are able to understand context.

Given the state of Xitter, I would argue that his control of Starlink is significantly more dangerous.

You couldn’t even refute those idiotic points properly.

My brother in Christ, they invented paper, fireworks, and the compass.

True. And irrelevant.

Because they developed more efficient engineering techniques and more advanced methods of industrial scale production. In the same way Japan ate the American auto industry’s lunch during the 80s and 90s by investing heavily in industry and education, China is flooding the zone with talented professionals and capital improvement projects.

And because the Chinese government is heavily subsidizing their auto industry in order to gain market share works wide. Pros for us: if we can buy these cars, the Chinese government is essentially subsidizing them for our consumers. Cons for us: without equivalent subsidies domestic car companies can’t possibly compete. There are genuine issues of trade fairness in play here.

The Chinese middle class is the largest in the world.

Relevant only if the Chinese middle class is who is working in those car factories. Is that the case?

I’m not even saying the tarrifs are good or bad. If they’re explicitly time boxed and our governments are able to stick to that deal, then they could be good. But in general tarrifs on EVs during a climate crisis driven by carbon emissions is explicitly counterproductive.

They’re not being actively held hostage in that there’s no giant prison with all their families in it.

They are being held hostage because of the implication. The whereabouts of their family is well known so are they going to toe the line? Of course, because of the implication.

Your comments is literally just ad-hominem too bruh.

The Republicans are capitalists. The Democrats are capitalists. To Marxists they are the same.

Meaningful, important distinctions can exist even when Marxists are unable to recognize them.

Social democratic reforms can alleviate the inequality and distribute the wealth more equitably, but, because it does not replace capitalism itself, it always falters.

Explain? Because systems ultimately fail , it’s no good? Longevity and risilience are worthwhile considerations when designing and economic system to govern a civilization, but uktimate fallibility does not invalidate them entirely. More to the point, what evidence is there that Marxists societies do/would last longer?

Again, that is not the claim that was made. You can’t even stay on topic. I bet Marx could stay on topic .

Yes, he and you are obviously wrong. Even if everything you said was 100 percent true (lol) the people who failed to stop facism are obviously not the same as fascists themselves. Everything thinking person knows this , and Marx would too if he was alive.

Sounds dumber everytime you say it.

Pretty sure every US president since Israel was invented has had to check Israel at some point.

Explain why you’re sure of this. American support for Israel is constant and extremely well entrenched. Every time the Israel PM shows up to Congress it turns into a contest to see who can suck his dick The most. The administration doesn’t matter. American support for Israel ranges from absolute material support with absolute political support, to absolute material support and only lukewarm political support. In both cases material support is unaffected.

He can’t get that loyalty from any other US president

Literally all evidence points to the opposite of this being true Lol

Basically, you’re saying that the rich should get richer at the cost of housing access for the poor. Not very socialist of you, eh?

Have you considered writing comments while not in a state of apoplectic rage? That way you might actually make a reasonable point instead of whatever this word-vomit is.

Apparently a lot of people’s investments are tied up in those properties so if they values tank they’ll lose everything. Normally I wouldn’t sympathize at all but Chinese people have very limited options to invest their money and grow their savings. They can’t just easily invest in the stock market. Property was one of the ways of doing this. If enough people lose enough money , the good old mandate of heaven gets its foundations rocked.