A huge minus of reddit was the heavy skew in politics to the right due to US influence.
I am obviously not going to switch away from Lemmy because there are communists here. That’s without knowing that piefed by default defederates communities for being communist.
So what? He will invade Greenland, get voted out and everything will turn back to normal? Because you disapproved of said actions?
Except, as I have quoted, the USA did this to enforce a decision made by it’s domestic court.
The operation was undertaken to enforce a warrant from a U.S. federal court
Today our UK Armed Forces showed skill and professionalism in support of a successful U.S. interception of the vessel Bella 1 while on its way to Russia. This action formed part of global efforts to crack down on sanctions busting.
Well, certainly don’t count on the UK to support international law.
Leader of the free world has quite a history, full of violations of other countries sovereignty.
So it’s not about all decks being the same.
Money, gambling is (even if obfuscated via tokens) about money.
Monopoly is not gambling because there is no (real) money involved. Uno is not gambling because there is no money involved.
Reactionary forks don’t have a great record of success (or even getting off the ground).
Saying the quiet part aloud, just like Donald.
Why are you quoting the definition of meat? Your previous comment was about sausage.
If the qualifier is only meat, nothing can be called a sausage with all the filler and other ingredients they’re adding these days.
Which the proposal defines as:
But to the legislators of the EU, a sausage can now have only one meaning: a cylindrical object containing meat.
Nowhere does it say only meat.
That’s a dishonest representation of the qualifier. It’s must have meat not must have only meat.
Civilian aircraft can also turn off their transponders, not that it’s relevant.
ATC not having radar is not an issue, the US military most certainly had multiple radars in range. They could tell the tanker to divert way earlier. They wanted an incident.
As for normalcy, the US is part of a small group of countries that has shot down civilian airliners.
Taiwan claims sovereignty over mainland China, I doubt Venezuela does the same with the US.
thank you, i think i saw that somwhere before. is it really true that the haressment is made up? like i honestly dont know
The one making the claims should provide the evidence.
and does it really has an impact on the eco system? i never really thought abou it…
Yes, it pushes for a Google monopoly in hardware, it creates a false narrative that there is no difference in privacy and/or security between alternative Android versions and ones by vendors. This further entrenches Google’s control of Android as it limits the options for Android users.
And i guess fair point that this is a security flaw considering the phone users beeing targeted… But like i still kinda think hardware backed security is important and also very crucial is, that the more devices they supporty the less recourses they have… I think considering how long it is since pixel 10 released and it is still not supported, would make me guess that they dont have like any free time really to do it at all ^^
I do believe Google has taken decisions that forced them to look for a new OEM, I am not sure if does affect the Pixel 10.
No GrapheneOS is not just calling them out on lack of security.
It’s apparently from their discord, so it took me a while to find it again.
It’s not about the personality of it’s directors, it’s about it’s effect on the (alternative) Android ecosystem as a whole, which is not just about security but also privacy and user control.
Even with regards to security, their choice of limiting devices apparently makes their users targets for extra scrutiny and harassment. That does have actual implications for people whose threat model includes authorities unless they already are guaranteed to be targets.
I don’t need a phone, GrapheneOS needs one now that Google is trying to force them out. I wonder if their new phone will actually meet all the requirements, if it comes out.
As for complaining, GrapheneOS is the one bitching about other Android versions existing since forever. Now, they 've started making unsubstantiated claims of them attacking them somehow.
Yes, before Google made phone on it’s own they supported some Nexus devices (google-partnered) and the Samsung Galaxy S4.
No it’s not. This is a recent development that has not yet actually come to fruition. It may exist in 2026.
Before that GrapheneOS dismissed any idea of targeting other phones than the ones build by one of the most anti-privacy companies on earth, that seeks to consolidate control of Android.
Yeah, I should probably switch home instances again, it didn’t use to defed hexbear when I joined.