

And of course, the usual two voting against.


And of course, the usual two voting against.
Hijueputa, and is genderless.
It’s culo not cullo
It would be “criado”, and more alike to “malcriado”. “Creado” is to made, while “criado” is to grew up.
Pendejo in Argentina is someone young.
Not really offencive, but my grandma hated with all her heart the term “mentirosa”, lier, if you ever call her that even as joke or light comment she would go like really mad. I never use that words because is inscribed on me that is one of the worst way to call someone.


Party all the time. Use all drugs. Fuck with everyone you can.


Unpopular opinions is in the next room.


You can get great discounts if you delete system32 from your PC.


Bet you are going to have the app installed and scanned for every government service you want to use (including leaving the country).


They want to spy on their people and protect their corporate interests.


Jmm Acktually… Santos Dumont fly first. What the Wright brothers did was inventing Angry Birds.


The actual content of Taiwan is not what the Chinese government wants for it, but their access to the south China sea and their claim to it.


Can’t say that is true for music at least. I heard new music everyday for the hundreds of artists I follow in youtube music and soundcloud.


I miss my RiF keyword filters.


Soy farming restores nitrogen on soil. The alternative of using chemical processes to restore that nitrogen is stopping farming corn, and that’s not happening.


Source: The Incel Journal of Natural Sciences.


Just today finished this podcast episode about that same topic
Citations Needed: Episode 157: How the “Culture War” Label Is Used to Trivialize Life-and-Death Economic Issues
“Let the Culture Wars Begin. Again,” The New York Times announces. “How the ‘Culture War’ Could Break Democracy,” warns Politico. “As The Culture Wars Shift, President Trump Struggles To Adapt,” NPR tells us. “Will Democrats Go on the Offensive in the Culture Wars?” Vanity Fair wonders.
Over and over, we’re reminded that so-called culture wars are being waged between a simplified Left and Right. Depending on who you ask, they tend to encompass issues under very broad categories: “LGBTQ rights,” “abortion,” “funding for the arts,” “policing,” “immigration,” “family values.” While there is some validity to the label of “culture war issue” – say, Republican opposition to an art installation, or tantrums over the gender of M&Ms – most of the time, the term is woefully misapplied.
Despite what much of the media claims, LGBTQ rights, police violence, abortion, and so many other issues aren’t just “culture war” fluff in the same league as the latest Fox News meltdown about a cartoon character. Nor are they both-sides-able matters of debate. They’re matters of real, material consequence, often with life-and-death stakes. So why is it that these are placed under the “culture war” umbrella? And what are the dangers of characterizing them that way?
On this episode, we discuss the vague nature of the term “culture war”; how this lack of clarity is weaponized to gloss over and minimize life-and-death issues like police violence and gender-affirming healthcare; and how the only consistent criterion for a “culture war” seems to be issues that impact someone other than the media’s default audience, i.e., a white professional-class man.
Our guest is The Real News Network Editor-in-Chief Max Alvarez.
Episode webpage: https://citationsneeded.libsyn.com/episode-157-how-the-culture-war-label-is-used-to-trivialize-life-and-death-economic-issues


And all the stolen land projects on the west bank are strategically built to close up water access
That sounds like sarcasm to me