If only there was some way to just not use the ai features and move on with your life.

Sure but these things are not remotely comparable.

It really doesn’t require much aside from backing up, I can have a linux system up and running with a complete beginner in 30 minutes or so.

Except this is free

So many people have successfully argued against claims I did not make.

https://www.emergentmind.com/papers/2409.06185

https://huggingface.co/papers/2409.04109

ai does new things all the time and this is easily validated and explained with the concept of temperature.

It is validated, yale confirmed that it is the case that a novel hypothesis was generated, it was not REPRODUCED, which is irrelevant to my claim that they created a novel hypothesis.

i see how that wording is confusing.

It doesn’t have to be to invalidate the claim. It proposed a novel hypothesis, this is the easiest thing to check in the world.

since I don’t have to rely on google it really doesn’t have to even be a decent source.

https://www.emergentmind.com/papers/2409.06185

https://huggingface.co/papers/2409.04109

You have not said one thing i did not already know, none of it has to do with anything

an ai did something novel, this is an easily verified fact. The only alternative is that somebody else wrote the hypothesis.

He knows the basics, it’s just that they don’t lead to any of the conclusions he’s claiming they do. He also boldly assumes that everyone who disagrees with him doesn’t know anything. He’s a beast of confirmation bias.

You addressed that they haven’t tested the hypothesis completely while completely overlooking the fact that an ai suggested a novel hypothesis… even if it comes out to be wrong it is still undeniably a novel hypothesis. This is what was validated by yale…

you have still failed to answer the question. You’re also neglecting to include an explanation of temperature in your argument, which may be relevant here.

You sound drunk on kool-aid, this is a validated scientific report from yale, tell me a problem with the methodology or anything of substance.

so what if that’s how it works? It clearly is capable of novel things.

yes, google reported about their ai discovering a novel cancer treatment, of course they did?

now tell me about how it isn’t true. Do you have anything of substance to discredit this?

this reeks of confirmation bias, did you even try to invalidate your preconcieved notions?

https://blog.google/technology/ai/google-gemma-ai-cancer-therapy-discovery/ how did it do this?

That’s true, but android has some pretty fundamental issues that would take some massive rewrites to fully resolve, not to mention that if we switched to linux patches wouldn’t have to be written for multiple operating systems.

Linux mobile will be harder to build but in the long run will be vastly better, but it’s admittedly a very long run.

Aosp makes more sense as a short term strategy, but google is making developing graphene harder, linux mobile is a much better long term strategy

Wow it’s actually a usb-a port, I don’t know how they’re sending that much data over it but it’s certainly close to its limits, there’s a reason most monitors aren’t usb and all usb webcams suck

That’s making use of a one way port, I can’t plugin a displayport backwards.

bitwarden?