chgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]

And they can do that based on the way your write text posts too, so probably not worth worrying about camera sensor fingerprinting too much.

Just don’t post about your insurrection plans on public forums in general, with or without photos.

The Harry Potter thing was EXIF https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2007/07/harry-potter-and-digital-fingerprints

But pictures can also be traced back to a camera based on irregularities in the camera sensor https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/tracing-photos-back-to-the-camera-that-snapped-them/

Unlike with the printers, there is probably no database of the CMOS sensor irregularities of all cameras ever made. But if you upload pictures under your government name and the take pictures with the same camera and share them anonymously, this could be traced back to you in theory.

Arguably e-privacy and gdpr require a reject all button.

Just make companies respect the do not track flag I can select in the browser.

Denmark (currently presiding over meetings in the Council of the European Union) suggested in May to drop consent banners for cookies collecting data “for technically necessary functions”

That already doesn’t require consent

or “simple statistics."

Also doesn’t require consent, when the statistics are anonymous.