I think the actual headline should be “Apple forced to remove some illegal barriers to app installation for users in Brazil”.
I am annoyed by the headline giving Apple the agency to let users use their device. Screw that, if someone buys a device they should be able to use it however they please, including installing their own OS and their own apps on top, and replacing any part of the hardware. Anything preventing that should be illegal.
There is a difference yes
Ok, point out the material difference between war crimes conducted by obama and trump. “Decorum” or “justifications” don’t count as material differences.
trump is worse on many other topics, from outright fascism in the US to openly supporting fascists abroad to cutting USAID and such, but in terms of military action this administration is mostly just following the long-established bipartisan war crime traditions.
No, it literally isn’t?
Murder is the process of intentionally killing a living being.
The entire species is not a living being. Extinction of a species can come from murder of all its individuals, but it doesn’t have to. I’m literally proposing a solution under which there is no murder happening at all, and all individuals live out their lives happily until peaceful death, more or less.
Extinction of a species is not a problem by itself, especially when the members of that species don’t have the necessary mental abilities to understand the concepts of species or extinction. It can be a problem if it causes ecosystem failure, which then results in unnecessary suffering and death. But it’s not a problem by itself.
What you are proposing (keeping the animal farming industry going) will involve a lot of murder of animals, whichever way you structure it, or however many “animal welfare” stickers you put on the end products.
My solution involves murdering exactly 0 animals.
Letting animals live out their lives until peaceful death is the opposite of murder.
Your solution involves a continuous cycle of exploitation and murder with no feasible end in sight.
So, keep the cycle of exploitation and murder going, but with slightly less shitty conditions? It’s an improvement for sure, but doesn’t solve the fundamental issue with murdering animals.
Ok, name me a nutrient and I’ll give you either a plant-based source of it or evidence that your body or gut biome produces it itself
And yeah, I agree, if you want to have a healthy diet you need to read up on dietology and/or visit a dietologist. But this has nothing to do with veganism, omnivores need to do it too.
So, what is your proposal? This is not a rhetorical question, I’ve thought and read about it for a while and it seems to me like the least bad practical option, because the others are:
I’m asserting it because it’s true. I’m vegan for over 7 years now, the only supplements I take is B12 (and occasionally D), I’m in good health. I’m friends with a vegan of 20 years, the only supplements she takes is B12 and iron, and she’s in good health. The science backs it up as well, plants contain almost everything we need to exist.
In order to be healthy, you have to make sure your diet is varied and contains the sources for all necessary nutrients, but then it’s exactly the same for omnivores.
Yeah, I guess I’m not entirely accurate, because you can get some tiny amount of B12 from plant-based sources (e.g. nori). But it’s probably not enough, so vegans should supplement it. The rest is probably fine unless you’re blasting junk food every day.
Yes it is. Everything except B12 can either be found in some plant-based foods, or produced by your body. B12 is the only supplement you need.
I do care about the planet actually surviving this. We’ve created way too many animals, the natural ecosystems won’t be able to sustain them all if we release them into the wild and let them reproduce. The outcome will be devastated ecosystems and a lot of animals dying due to starvation. Sterilization is the least inhumane way out of this mess.
our bodies need the nutrients that come from meat.
This is definitely false. You can live as a vegetarian (i.e. stop eating meat) without any supplemental nutrients.
If you wanna go vegan, you will need to supplement your diet with B12. That’s the only nutrient that can’t be found naturally in plant-based sources. TBH practically speaking, if you’re in the west, you’ll probably be fine nowadays, because most prefab vegan foods (incl. vegan milks) are enriched with B12.
I’m vegan, all I do is take a B12 pills weekly, and all my vitamin levels were fine last time I got a check. I could probably skip the pill if I went out to eat more, or bought more prefab food, but I mostly cook for myself and so don’t get many B12-enriched foods.
Most humans live in cities nowadays, and all of those humans can easily switch to a plant-based diet within a couple of years (which would mostly be redirecting the supply chains for plant proteins from animal agriculture to humans directly). There are some edge-cases where people really do depend on animals (subsistence farming, hunter-gatherer societies, etc). We can deal with those later.
Stop forcefully reproducing them, sterilize as necessary, let them live out the rest of their lives. It’s not too complicated.
We’ve done a lot of other awful things since forever: forced child “marriages” (or just sexual abuse before then), child exploitation, some form of slavery, have all been a thing for millenia. And yet many societies now frown upon those, punish the perpetrators and help the victims.
What makes you think this (or other awful shit we still do) will be any different?
All those actions are no more or less “in our DNA” then meat consumption.
And, well, vegans have convinced some non-trivial amount of people, as you can deduce by the fact that many companies put “vegan” stickers on their products, because they think it will increase their profits.
Yes.
Start with prohibiting animal farming, then ban animal murder alltogether.
It is the only solution, it is not actually that difficult, and it is an inevitable outcome of human development.
In a few centuries, humans will look at today’s animal explotation the same way we look at cannibalism and slavery.
You can also get away with being queer in Yerevan. Not anywhere else in Armenia sadly.
Armenia is perfectly safe as well and everyone speaks Russian there.
Telegram can serve you your old “Cloud” messages, in a decrypted form, on a new device, without any communication with the old device.
This means that they possess the keys to decrypt the messages, since they can send them to you in a decrypted form.
Those messages can’t even be encrypted with your cloud password (which would be a pretty weak encryption anyways), because you can reset the cloud password via your recovery email, and still retain access to your messages.
Contrast this with encrypted chats on Matrix, where you have to go through the device verification procedure, which prompts the old device to send decryption keys to the new device (it’s actually more complicated but this gets the point across). If you lose access to all your devices (and your recovery key), your encrypted messages are gone, the server admin can’t restore them because they simply don’t have the key.
No one can’t prove that Telegram use MTProto to encrypt content sent using Cloud Chat, stores them encrypted, and them decrypt them upon opening because the source code for MTProto is closed. So how can you prove that what you’re saying is the way they use?
This is a distinction without a difference.
My claim is:
They possess the keys to decrypt your messages
Whether this is implemented via MTProto encryption or disk encryption or whatever, it doesn’t matter, they can read your messages if they want to.
Telegram is actually pretty transparent that Cloud chats are not e2e encrypted in their FAQ. They also go on to babble about “MTProto client-server encryption” but if you spend 2 minutes looking at it, you can see it’s just 256-bit AES with a shared key generated via Diffie-Hellman, not too dissimilar from plain HTTPS. In that sense it’s about as secure as e-mail over encrypted IMAP/SMTP, or IRC over TLS, or DMs here on lemmy.
They also claim that their at-rest encryption keys are separate from the data they encrypt, and claim that somehow this “requires court orders from multiple jurisdictions” to force them to give over your data, which is just ridiculous from a legal standpoint and won’t stand up in court. And actually, it’s way more likely that they will just cave in and give up your message history without a lawsuit at all, just look at what happened to Durov in France.
In the very old times, you’d have to be born rich already to do maths. You then don’t concern yourself with making a living, because your slaves do it for you.
In the old times, you’d live the same as artists: find a rich dude (exceptionally rarely: dudess) to pay your bills, and in exchange name shit you discover/invent after them.
Last few decades you also have a couple new options. You can work (teach) at a university for pennies, and typically have a second job/side hustle so that you can actually survive. And/or you can write books/make a YT channel, and if you’re lucky and get popular enough, that can be your living then, but it’s probably not going to be anything too advanced. And/or, if your area of expertise has some vaguely practical application (e.g. cryptography or statistics), you can actually find a job that pays you to do theoretical research in that area in hopes of finding practical application, but you’d have to be pretty lucky to get that.
