Phones were always banned in my classes. I don’t know why anybody expected smartphones to be allowed.

If even during an activity where concentration isn’t necessary they can distract, just ban them. The cinema is a good example they are bright, somebody always forgets to turn off the sound, and while you look up who that actor is or whatever, you miss part of the movie. In school, even if you decided to look something up related to what the teacher is saying, you’d lose track of what they were saying while looking it up.

Goddamn. I bet long range weapons would’ve been able to do that long ago.

El oh el

Man, Mozilla used to be nice but they have just turned so shit. I hope the core firefox people quit and make a new browser so that I can donate directly to the new browser instead of some middle man (or woman right now) who siphons off the money (aka Mozilla).

Israel just made it impossible to get through security…

Booby-trapped walkie-talkies and pagers.

FuckMyHineY.net

Awesome name

deleted by creator

“I’ll buy anything that’s shiny and comes from Apple” 👌

Sony Releases Stupid Piece Of Shit That Doesn’t Fucking Work. Replace by Sony by Apple and it still fits perfectly.

First the gays and trans. Respect the order.

But it would require a stable power supply – which only a nuclear reactor can provide, as the Moon’s lengthy lunar nights make solar energy unreliable.

And what happens when that doesn’t magically solve your problems?

“It’s all I know” 🎉 Just inertia.

Bunch of idiots believing whatever they see online. Just shows how bad education is in our world.

Is that a shred of concern? Could he lose the war if longs range missiles were allowed?

Because in real life I don’t like people looking over my shoulder at everything I do and digital snooping is the same (or worse).

Yep, but who’s going to give them a better option? Western citizens would have to vote for governments that don’t consider exploitation a “necessary evil” and for politicians that want enforcement of a fair trade supply chain. A prosperous Africa would mean more legal and most importantly highly skilled immigration.

But western citizens aren’t willing to accept higher prices for goods as a result, so they don’t vote that way. Instead it’s easier to consume indiscriminately and whine when the people living in squalor dare look for a better life abroad.

You didn’t grasp what I wrote. Let me spell it out for you: Bad west make Africa poor. Poor Africa want better option. Poor Africa make better deal (still bad though) with bad China. Better not always mean good.

Do you understand now?

Why don’t you look into how much of Africa’s resources exit the continent for Western use at a fraction of the actual price?

Who do you think put African countries in the precarious positions they are in where they feel nearly obliged to look at seemingly better deals?