

That Imperial Japan would not have surrendered without atomic weapons being used on civilians. Not just the “necessary evil” excuse.
Aside: Does anyone know what they teach about the Korean War in the US?
he/they


That Imperial Japan would not have surrendered without atomic weapons being used on civilians. Not just the “necessary evil” excuse.
Aside: Does anyone know what they teach about the Korean War in the US?


You know what ‘the global community’ likes even more than the moral high ground? Lots of cheap oil. And this time they won’t even have to deal with the refugee crisis!


If they were actual drug boats, the CIA would have posted more job offerings by now.


We have investigated ourselves and concluded th-… he did WHAT?


Well it’s good to have official confirmation after 80 years.


Wait, what? Liberals are the capitalists now?
Now and since around the 18th Century. Private ownership of property and market economies are key liberal tenets.


Yeah the article mentioned icebreakers too but I was specifically referring to merchant cargo ships


Perhaps less useful now, but it never sat right with me that Namco has a patent for minigames during loading screens.


Huh, I had never considered civilian nuclear powered cargo ships. Wikipedia says only 4 were ever built and only 1 remains nuclear-powered (the Russian Sevmorput, built in 1988.) I suppose thorium molten salt reactors, being potentially smaller and lower cost, can make for easier adoption


Now if it never pops at least it’s funny that he lost a bunch of money


Not even this guy would do it



Other countries should just start bombing american yatchs and jets. They’re much more likely to contain drugs.
Wanting a LLM do not hallucinate is like wanting a heater to not generate heat.


Mr. Xi, please nationalize the stroopwafel industry. There is a huge market out there (me)


Operation Barbarossa 2: Surely this time it’ll be like Poland


Tired: the children yearn for the mines
Wired: the mines yearn for more children


I assume for the same reason Lenin supported Arthur Henderson.
At present, British Communists very often find it hard even to approach the masses, and even to get a hearing from them. If I come out as a Communist and call upon them to vote for Henderson and against Lloyd George, they will certainly give me a hearing. And I shall be able to explain in a popular manner, not only why the Soviets are better than a parliament and why the dictatorship of the proletariat is better than the dictatorship of Churchill (disguised with the signboard of bourgeois “democracy”), but also that, with my vote, I want to support Henderson in the same way as the rope supports a hanged man—that the impending establishment of a government of the Hendersons will prove that I am right, will bring the masses over to my side, and will hasten the political death of the Hendersons and the Snowdens just as was the case with their kindred spirits in Russia and Germany.
I might be doing good DSA chapters wrong by comparing them to the Labour guy who doesn’t like strikes lol
I think if you can ignore ethics rules at your convenience, I think they’re more like ethics suggestions