No you don’t get it. They did this because the Bush administration didn’t want to confront the problem of potentially innocent people being murdered

If this was their concern, why didn’t they just let them go? take them back where they took them from? after all, they didn’t have enough evidence to even charge them

Side note, you should really check your reasoning here bud. You are literally arguing that the USA, in an abundance of care for the safety of certain people, they took them and left them to rot in a concentration camp for decades…

confirming circular logic is circular… got it

So instead they are kept uncharged and untried forever in Guantanamo??? where they are nicely safe and comfortable and not being tortured at all? for THEIR safety? got it

Isn’t that what jails are for? in USA you have a ton of those I hear… if these people were guilty of anything, surely there would be zero trouble charging them (specially in the Kangaroo Military courts of the USA). Once convicted you can put them in any jail of your liking

Some of those people were guilty and should have been tried and jailed here

if so, why weren’t they tried and sentenced?

Yes, I know how kids act… the point is that he is cutting the USA’s nose to spite its face… so not sure how is that any “win” for the USA…

When was Mexico refusing to be at the table? There is an open relationship and trade agreements in place already… if Trump wanted to talk to Mexico about anything he could have done so with zero barriers

In the meantime, you can rest assured that to “bring Mexico” to the imaginary table they were not in, he torpedoed 100% of trust anyone in the world could possibly have about any contract or agreement with the USA

That stigma was mostly created by Americans … They just don’t want it for themselves

I would think so but don’t really know from a legal standpoint

What’s clear now is that a contract with the USA is not worth an “Elon’s promise” so any current agreement is basically null and void

You are not wrong in some of theses but they would requiere a legal framework that does not exist today to be created in a hurry.

Tariffs are literally easier so they are the first step and it does not mean they would be the last

I don’t need to… Muricans took care of destroying democracy all on their own

I didn’t really need another reason to love Debian more but here we are… I’m donating to Debian today

as opposed to OpenAI which also stores keystrokes and then sells them to anyone who’d pay?

sure, but that can be said of literally anything. It would be interesting if LLM were at least new but they have been around forever, we just now have better hardware to run them

Besides that, a lot of the value is derived from the market trying to figure out if/what company will develop AGI. Whatever company manages to achieve it will easily become the most valuable company in the world, so people fomo into any AI company that seems promising.

There is zero reason to think the current slop generating technoparrots will ever lead into AGI. That premise is entirely made up to fuel the current “AI” bubble

Not necessarily… if I gave you my “faster car” for you to run on your private 7 lane highway, you can definitely squeeze every last bit of the speed the car gives, but no more.

DeepSeek works as intended on 1% of the hardware the others allegedly “require” (allegedly, remember this is all a super hype bubble)… if you run it on super powerful machines, it will perform nicer but only to a certain extend… it will not suddenly develop more/better qualities just because the hardware it runs on is better