How can a news agency have that kind of power?
How can a news agency have that kind of power?
So many games now do not even have any way to effectively communicate, which I find even worse. I found so many good friends while gaming, all impossible in those games where you end up with random people game after game with no communication.
Those that are culturally close to each other.
“after one attack” now that is thinking outside the box. I wonder why they build the iron dome.
Lemmy in a nutshell. Mostly a very specific group of people.
It would skew it even more to rich people. Since… you know… everyone else has to work.
Ah so only rich people can ever be politicians as everyone else simply can’t afford it.
So instead of letting them free they murder them?
What the actual fuck are you talking about. Hamas murders people all the fucking time, posting videos of their brutal murders etc. proudly online. IDF has no interest in killing hostages, it does not help them, it can only backfire.
This is the report where you got that picture from. On page 44 are the assumptions for storage costs: 100 to 400 MWh of storage, assuming they are charged and discharged 315 times per year (so eg. 31’500 MWh storage output per year for 100 MWh capacity). Those do not need to be 100% cycles, but given that a year has hardly more days than 315 and some days even see no production, they need to be cycled pretty much every day the sun is shining. Anyway, what is my point? We need more than a few hours of storage to make it work. But the more storage you have, the less you actually use it, making it disproportionaly more expensive. Note what they say:
Lithium-ion batteries remain the most cost competitive short-term (i.e., 2 – 4-hour) storage technology
We need more than 2 or 4 hours. A single night is already far longer than that. The shorter the storage duration, the cheaper it is. Of course this skewes the numbers. It is like calculating the storage cost of nuclear waste for only 2 years. Of course it looks better.
Ah, thanks for that detailed reply, let me try: Nuclear is still a lot cheaper.
Okay and did you add all the extra cost to make that work? Like when talking about nuclear we do not just look at the reactor itself. For example you need lots of storage and distribution to make renewables work.
So even if we assume it is not economically viable… I would rather not have another few billion tons of CO2 just to save some money.
It says 2 hours ago, but haven’t I read this here yesterday?
Not all of them made it to their destination. What a massive success for Ukraine.
I pay for “the subscription” and have not used it for anything remotely evil.