It’s not android based anymore.

Actually if it was a truly free market it’d be worse, even fewer protections on privacy and wages!

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-Mint-Wayland-Screensaver

It was never impossible or difficult it’s just nobody bothered because screensavers are actually bad.

Not all implementations are slower, only certain ones.

It does not lack screensavers and there is no reason it has to be more demanding. The protocol isn’t more demanding, the implementations are

If you add support for archive tune’s remote play you could be a great companion app and make my need for spotifies remote play gone!

That’s one benchmark that they focused on, but having double checked, you’re right, I was thinking of this one where it lags behind gpt 5.6 https://deepswe.datacurve.ai/

It does not seem to be better except in terms of cost

This is misleading, he’s talking about code review tools not vibecoding…

I would only really get a linux tablet, I’m with you on that, I plan to use a metal lapdesk with a charachorder and magnets which will mitigate the exact issues you’re talking about while also letting me take a tablet on my flights so less bulk. Gotta get a bit creative if you’re doing it that way but it is doable.

Have you been to shenzhen? I’m planning a trip there and want to know what it’s like. Endless honking will be a problem for me, darn. Also disappointed to hear the cities aren’t walkable

You can plug in a keyboard

Interested in your experience, what went wrong?

…no? https://english.sse.com.cn/

there’s also a bond market.

So? Aren’t they just wrong? Why reject the whole philosophy because some people are wrong about it?

Are you no longer a communist over this? I don’t really see how your stance on immigration is very related.

Why can’t it be both?

I don’t see how it’s subjective.

You’re confusing the olympiad with the erdos conjecture. This is just really not true, they just asked it and it found a solution, the mathmatician then used it’s solution as inspiration to create a better one. It still essentially did it on its own, and they certainly do the olympiad on their own.

I am not, you inaccurately said that the math olympiad was not bested by llm’s because they had a tool that told them if they were close but incorrect and can just try an infinite number of times. This is incorrect, they had a number of tries with python. This just isn’t a true statement. I think them besting it with use of python is equally significant and still counts as them besting it, and saying they can’t do math work is absurd.

I don’t know what you mean, I wasn’t the one who claimed they couldn’t do something they clearly can.