• FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    I don’t believe Syria ever styled itself “Democratic”. But the Syrian Republic was certainly a republic.

    For that matter, so was the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

    A republic is simply a nation with no monarch. If you don’t believe me ask any Canadian, as they are constantly debating whether to officially leave the British crown and become a republic.

    • ghurab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Not as a title, but if i recall correctly, the first first article of the old constitution states that the Syrian Arab Republic is a Democracy. Also for what it’s worth, the Baath party was also officially “socialist”.

      The lack of a monarchy isn’t enough to qualify as a republic, the people need to also hold some sort of power.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Being a republic has nothing to do with whether ordinary people hold power. For example in Plato’s Republic, power was exclusively held by philosophers because ordinary people were unwise and could not be trusted.

    • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yea, the name is originally in latin res publica, meaning “public matter”. In opposition to a kingdom that is the private domain of a single person.