Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has stressed that no country or world leader has the right to negotiate with Russia on behalf of Ukraine. He noted that any dialogue with the Kremlin must be held according to an agreed action plan and only from a position of strength.

Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy asserted that no world leader has the right to negotiate with Russian President Vladimir Putin on behalf of Ukraine.

Speaking to Le Parisien readers, Zelenskyy emphasized that Ukraine alone determines its future and any dialogue with Russia must follow a peace plan based on strength and international support.

He warned against negotiating without clear guarantees of security, highlighting the risks of Putin resuming aggression after a ceasefire.

Zelenskyy called for a strategy ensuring Ukraine’s long-term stability and security, beyond NATO or EU membership timelines.

  • john89@lemmy.caEnglish
    519·
    9 days ago

    And take their aid along with them?

    What if this means Ukraine is no longer able to defend itself?

    • Maalus@lemmy.worldEnglish
      112·
      9 days ago

      Then they can fuck off across the ocean with their aid. Ukraine isn’t the US’s puppet.

      • john89@lemmy.caEnglish
        520·
        9 days ago

        Alright well, I guess it can be Russia’s puppet then.

        • Maalus@lemmy.worldEnglish
          8·
          9 days ago

          Uh huh, it would be less a russian puppet than the US negotiating another countries’ fate.

        • DicJacobus@lemmy.worldEnglish
          7·
          9 days ago

          to paraphrase an old Polish quote, (on dealing with Russians) “The Rubble is preferable to Russian Dominion”

          • john89@lemmy.caEnglish
            213·
            9 days ago

            Maybe it’s just me, but life in Ukraine didn’t look all that different from life in Russia before the invasion.

            Both nations are far behind the civilized world when it comes to social issues. Corruption was cited as a major reason for denying Ukraine entrance into NATO.

            • DicJacobus@lemmy.worldEnglish
              11·
              9 days ago

              the difference beforehand was that prior to the shooting (big shooting at least). One was a flawed democracy that was trying to improve, and trying to do to itself what Poland did to itself after 20-30 years in NATO and EU.

              the other was an authoritarian mob state. going from one to the other, was evidently worth fighting to the death over, I am inclined to agree.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldMEnglish
              42·
              9 days ago

              Maybe it’s just me, but life in Ukraine didn’t look all that different from life in Russia before the invasion.

              You mean apart from all the dead Ukrainians and the ethnic cleansing and the kidnapped children and such?

              • john89@lemmy.caEnglish
                21·
                8 days ago

                before the invasion.

                I swear, everytime you reply to me it’s in bad faith.

                You need to brush up on your reading comprehension and take a class on persuasive writing.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldMEnglish
                  22·
                  8 days ago

                  Yeah, I read what you wrote. Unless you meant before the invasion of Crimea, and I don’t think you did, I stand by what I said.