• Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    Next thing they have to do is add support for realme, huawei and doogee phones or any phone running a certain version of google or having certain specs and letting users take the chance on installation and bricking. Rather than pixel phones only because this is shit not being able to use graphene.

  • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Excellent! Since Signal removed SMS support there’s no trusted app supporting old SMS and encrypted messaging on one UI

  • AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    A big hurdle with RCS was carrier adoption, at least in Asia.

    I wonder about two things:

    1. Would Graphene team’s implementation be usable on other devices that are less fortunate to be supported by the OS?
    2. Would this be a drop-in replacement or would Graphene team need to work with carriers so that their implementation actually work?

    On a tangential note, I would really like to read an in-depth analysis of how RCS had such a botched up implementation, which it has still to recover from almost a decade later.

    The adoption is nowhere close to what it should have been, and instead it is now more associated with spam than actual communication. The Wikipedia entry does cover a lot of aspects, but it doesn’t explain how it went wrong.

    • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      biggest hurdle after that is that it still sucks ass compared to e2ee IM apps, and no one uses SMS nowadays anyway, so we barely benefit from pre existing SMS users that would be able to seemslessly swap to RCS because SMS users don’t really exist, it basically has to face against the network effect of Whatsapp, Facebook messager, iMessage and WeChat, just like Signal has too [face the network effect] while being less secure than Signal and having less features

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The number of Europeans in here acting like What’s App, which might as well be Facebook Messenger, is some sort of high road is hilarious.

    • brax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah I still don’t get why people use or promote WhatsApp. If anything, use Signal or even Telegram

      • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You can’t use Signal or Telegram because your contacts are on WhatsApp, but yes WhatsApp might as well be called Facebook Messenger

      • Lichtblitz@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Telegram is worse than even Whatsapp, since it’s not even pretending to be end to end encrypted.

        The real choice is signal or threema.

      • mursejoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I have thought this for years. Everyone slimes on Americans for using iMessage and asks who no WhatsApp? Same reason I’m not on facebook, don’t use a meta quest, and don’t use instagram.

        • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          WhatsApp does not commit the sin of not having cross platform support at all, it is genuinely the most pratical and easy to use proprietary IM solution besides the network effect

        • outerspace@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          While Whatsapp is not great, the problem with iMessage is that it is (was?) locked exclusively to the apple platform

          • Ripley_Tripley@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Yeah, thats the main issue with imessage (and it still is) and if your switching from IOS to android, you have to start over on all of your messages unless if you figure out a way to back them up.

  • SethDove@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Literally everyone should just use Signal. I really don’t understand why we all don’t.

    • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Because Signal 1) doesn’t ship as default, and 2) requires a login process.

      You’ve already lost the majority of the general public with #1. The Venn diagram of people who go through with #2 and the people who already know about Signal is nearly a complete circle.

      • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Used to shill XMPP but everyone should use Tox at this point ngl.

        • No registration
        • No phone number
        • It’s impossible to send anything unencrypted

        downside: Sharing IDs is annoying (QR code if you are on mobile? idk haven’t tried)

        updownsides:

        • It does not concern itself with backlog storage (unsent messages sit until at least one device of both parties are online)
        • It does not concern itself with file storage (sent - poof, gone)
        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          55 minutes ago

          You see, the problem is that whatsapp came very early, when it released it wasn’t shit and it provided free messages which in many european countries wasn’t a thing yet, everyone hopped on it and used it as main communication platform, this created a big ass network effect that is nearly unescapeable, even today i can’t escape from it because i am the only idiot who uses Signal and Matrix and no one wants to leave whatsapp because they already have an account and all their contacts

        • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Was true (except for trustworthy encryption). Then network effects took over and peer pressure did the work.

          It could happen again in a good way this time, but the resistance will be stiff.

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        I used signal offical app and honestly it has a good UI and UX, what does it lack? What seems bad? I don’t understand

      • kepix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 hours ago

        what ui? there is a namelist, a call icon, a message icon. what in the hell do you need?

        • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          one thing missing is support for Android Tablets, its pissing my GF off on her Samsung Tablet and yet it works for my mother on her ipad ffs

  • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    12 hours ago

    2 weeks now on Graphene. This is what a phone OS should be, simple, boring, juste the basics without a shit-ton of bloatware and spying crap.

    • Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This has been available since forever, though. Cyanogenmod/LineageOS was the biggest. Oneplus followed along and I love my OP15, though that’s coming to a bitter end

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I switched away from e/OS for this very reason. As much as I hate SMS based communications it just isn’t practical to ditch them completely in the US. It’s simply too widespread.

    • VAK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s the next gen sms, with features to bring it closer to parity with popular messaging apps

    • carrylex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Ok so RCS is basically WhatsApp/Signal but Google(+Carriers) but retarded:

      • The client software is propiertary and screws you over when you e.g. root your phone
      • They finally realized that E2EE exists - 10 years after everyone else implemented it
      • You can’t view the docs unless you’re a Google Partner
      • The protocol seems to be a mess
      • You need a mobile data connection for it to work (sometimes not)
      • Knowbody knows how the server software works or can be hosted, everything is “Google Jibe” or needs to connect to it to work
      • brax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 hours ago

        whatsApp […] But retarded

        Huh? That’s literally a Meta platform… Doesn’t get much worse than that. I’d sooner just use SMS

        • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          AFAIK this is SMS… Well, they are using RCS to hijack it. So you start SMS conversation and if both parties have it enabled or will switch to their protocol. Kind of what iMessage does.

          Yeah, I keep RCS disabled on my phone and preferably would replace it with another app, but didn’t know a good alternative.

      • matlag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago
        • GOS will code a proprietary client, like Whatsapp? I doubt…
        • It’s E2E with 3 ends, the 3rd one being Meta, like Whatsapp?
        • There is no doc available, like Whatsapp?
        • The server is as closed as one can be like Whatsapp?

        Frankly, if one actor gets in RCS and gives me confidence it’s going to be secure and respect our privacy as much as can be, it’s GOS.
        RCS might be below some other standards, but phone messaging is still a thing. GOS is not about idealistic massive adoption of Signal, it’s about what’s needed in the day-to-day life, but with privacy and security.

        • Mountaineer@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 hours ago

          What messaging service works without a data connection?

          mobile data connection.

          As opposed to wifi or the pigeons you linked.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I think it’s texts for people who don’t use Signal or WhatsApp, so… nobody I have ever met, I guess

      • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 minutes ago

        I am suprised that it took this long to find someone that mentions how RCS will need to fight the network effect of pre existing IM apps thanks to no one using SMS in 2026 (for good reason, it is genuinely garbage and unsafe)

      • lordziv@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It is literally a standardized communication protocol. That is what iMessage is

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You’re correct. EU users didn’t adopt, or at least continue to utilize, SMS based messaging like users in the US did. This is not a problem for anyone using web based messaging like the ones you mentioned.

        • smeg@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’m quite surprised by the reaction this comment has received, are Americans genuinely still using SMS? Don’t they need to have group chats, send pictures, transfer files, make audio and video calls, or make use of encryption?

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Sounds like you haven’t met anyone. Or more likely, it’s everyone not-you who is weird.

        • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 minutes ago

          sounds like you live in the land of the free, I mean the land of forced to use SMS becausd apple NPCs can’t be bothered to use a proper IM service

        • smeg@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Genuinely nobody I know has sent an SMS message for at least a decade, who are you still sending SMS to in this day and age when internet-based messengers exist?

  • lemmysmash@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    13 hours ago

    For those who got too excited by the title: read the original messages from the GrapheneOS. RCS de-facto is not an open technology, there’s a massive amount of work and multiple steps are needed to get anywhere near the proper independent implementation. It’s gonna be amazing if the GrapheneOS team pulls it off, but don’t get too excited about the release dates and its availability for other systems (e.g. Linux).

    • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      To be honest, I’d rather they use the effort elsewhere (as a very happy gOS user). The number of people on gOS who wouldn’t prefer Signal (without phone number rego) / Threema etc. is probably vanishingly small, but that takes going up against the incumbents with heavy resistance.

      There’s only so many irons you can keep in the fire. That said, gOS devs (sans drama) are freaking awesome, and seems to keep growing in number, if they can pull it off it will be a true coup.

      • lemmysmash@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 minutes ago

        That’s true on one hand, but on the other there are also family and friends with who we still want/need to communicate via the “normies” protocols, and it’s better to do it without explicit spyware on your phone (aka Play Services or Whatsapp). So yeah, it’s an absolutely ungrateful work what they’re doing, but huge thanks to them for that.

  • kepix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    bro trust me, its one more msg app, it is gonna solve everything, just one more bro

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I hope it’s functionally installable on other versions of android